Perineal Body Length Among Different Racial Groups in the First Stage of Labor

被引:22
作者
Tsai, Pai-Jong Stacy [1 ]
Oyama, Ian A. [1 ]
Hiraoka, Mark [1 ]
Minaglia, Steven [1 ]
Thomas, Jennifer [1 ]
Kaneshiro, Bliss [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
来源
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2012年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
perineal body length; perineal laceration; race; ANAL-SPHINCTER RUPTURE; FECAL INCONTINENCE; RISK-FACTORS; LACERATIONS; INJURY;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0b013e318255b096
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Anatomic differences among racial groups may contribute to observed differences in the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations at the time of vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in perineal body length between racial groups. Methods: Perineal body length was measured in primigravid women aged 18 to 45 years who were admitted in labor. Women were classified into 1 of 6 racial groups: White, Filipino, Japanese, Chinese, Native Hawaiian, or Micronesian. The primary outcome, perineal body length, was compared using analysis of variance. Results: A total of 200 women were recruited. There were no significant differences in perineal body length (P = 0.42) and severe perineal lacerations (P = 0.82) between the different racial groups. The mean (SD) perineal body length of women who had a severe laceration was 3.9 (0.5) versus 3.9 (0.6) cm in women who did not have a severe laceration (P = 0.98). Conclusion: Perineal body length does not seem to differ among the different racial groups studied and therefore an unlikely cause of racial variation in rates of severe perineal lacerations.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 167
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Deering SH, 2004, J REPROD MED, V49, P306
  • [2] Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage
    Donnelly, V
    Fynes, M
    Campbell, D
    Johnson, H
    O'Connell, PR
    O'Herlihy, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (06) : 955 - 961
  • [3] Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour
    Dua, Anupreet
    Whitworth, Melissa
    Dugdale, Annette
    Hill, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (11) : 1361 - 1364
  • [4] Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery
    FitzGerald, Mary P.
    Weber, Anne M.
    Howden, Nancy
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    Brown, Mort B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [5] Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after:: subjective and objective long term effects
    Fornell, EU
    Matthiesen, L
    Sjödahl, R
    Berg, G
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (03) : 312 - 316
  • [6] Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery
    Goldberg, J
    Hyslop, T
    Tolosa, JE
    Sultana, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (04) : 1063 - 1067
  • [7] Green JR, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V163, P100
  • [8] Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations
    Hopkins, LM
    Caughey, AB
    Glidden, DV
    Laros, RK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (02) : 455 - 459
  • [9] Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006
    Kudish, Beta
    Sokol, Robert J.
    Kruger, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (02) : 165 - 170
  • [10] Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Burrows, Lara J.
    Krohn, Marijane A.
    Weber, Anne M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (04) : 344.e1 - 344.e5