High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of uterine fibroids: does HIFU significantly increase the risk of pelvic adhesions?

被引:10
作者
Liu, Xiaofang [1 ]
Dong, Xiaojing [1 ]
Mu, Yan [2 ]
Huang, Guohua [2 ]
He, Jia [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Affiliated Hosp 2, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Suining Cent Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Suining, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Suining Municipal Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Suining, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
High intensity focused ultrasound; uterine fibroids; pelvic adhesion; influencing factor; abdominopelvic surgery; MYOMECTOMY; ABLATION;
D O I
10.1080/02656736.2020.1811903
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the prevalence of pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, then analyze the influencing factors of pelvic adhesions. Materials and methods From October 2010 to March 2020, a total of 2619 patients with uterine fibroids underwent either hysterectomy, myomectomy, or cesarean section in Suining Central Hospital of Sichuan province. Of the 2619 patients, 810 were excluded because of a documented history of either pelvic infections, endometriosis, prior abdominopelvic surgery, or gynecological malignancies; 1809 patients were enrolled and the data were retrospectively assessed for the prevalence and patterns of pelvic adhesions. Among them, 96 patients with uterine fibroids had had prior HIFU treatment (HIFU group), 1713 patients had not had HIFU or surgical treatments (control group). Results Among the 96 patients in the HIFU group, adhesions were detected in 42 patients, the incidence of pelvic adhesion being 43.75%; the 1713 patients in the control group, adhesions were detected in 619 patients, the prevalence of pelvic adhesion being 36.14%. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of adhesion between the two groups was observed (p = .132), no significant difference in location of pelvic adhesions between the two groups and no significant difference in the severity of adhesions between the two groups was observed (p > .05). Conclusions Based on our results with limited numbers, we concluded that HIFU treatment did not significantly increase the risk of pelvic adhesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1032
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids: an IDEAL prospective exploration study
    Chen, J.
    Li, Y.
    Wang, Z.
    McCulloch, P.
    Hu, L.
    Chen, W.
    Liu, G.
    Li, J.
    Lang, J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (03) : 354 - 364
  • [2] A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
    Hirschelmann, Anja
    Tchartchian, Garri
    Wallwiener, Markus
    Hackethal, Andreas
    De Wilde, Rudy Leon
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (04) : 1089 - 1097
  • [3] Comparison of the Prevalence of Adhesions at the time of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Infertility between Patient who had open Myomectomy and those who had no Previous Pelvic-abdominal Surgery or Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
    Ikechebelu, J. I.
    Eleje, G. U.
    Joe-Ikechebelu, N. N.
    Okafor, C. D.
    Akintobi, A. O.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 21 (11) : 1415 - 1421
  • [4] High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours
    Kennedy, JE
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [5] Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases
    Liu, Yunchang
    Zhang, Wendy Wenyi
    He, Min
    Gong, Chunmei
    Xie, Bin
    Wen, Xiangxia
    Li, Dandan
    Zhang, Lian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2019, 35 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [6] Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery
    Mais, Valerio
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (17) : 4917 - 4925
  • [7] The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US
    Sikirica, Vanja
    Bapat, Bela
    Candrilli, Sean D.
    Davis, Keith L.
    Wilson, Malcolm
    Johns, Alan
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2011, 11
  • [8] Stewart EA, 2016, NAT REV DIS PRIMERS, V2, DOI [10.1038/nrdp.2016.43, 10.1056/NEJMcp1411029]
  • [9] Sun AiJun Sun AiJun, 2008, Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, V24, P369
  • [10] Adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery
    Tulandi, T
    Al-Shahrani, A
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (04) : 395 - 398