Why Do Some Primary Care Practices Engage in Practice Improvement Efforts Whereas Others Do Not?

被引:27
作者
Goldberg, Debora Goetz [1 ]
Mick, Stephen S. [2 ]
Kuzel, Anton J. [3 ]
Feng, Lisa Bo [4 ]
Love, Linda E. [5 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Policy, Ctr Healthcare Qual, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Hlth Adm, Sch Allied Hlth Profess, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Family Med, Richmond, VA USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Policy, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[5] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Social Work, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Primary care; practice transformation; quality improvement; qualitative research; CENTERED MEDICAL HOME; INFRASTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.12000
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To understand what motivates primary care practices to engage in practice improvement, identify external and internal facilitators and barriers, and refine a conceptual framework. Data Sources In-depth interviews and structured telephone surveys with clinicians and practice staff (n=51), observations, and document reviews. Study Design Comparative case study of primary care practices (n=8) to examine aspects of the practice and environment that influence engagement in improvement activities. Data Collection Methods Three on-site visits, telephone interviews, and two surveys. Principal Findings Pressures from multiple sources create conflicting forces on primary care practices' improvement efforts. Pressures include incentives and requirements, organizational relationships, and access to resources. Culture, leadership priorities, values set by the physician(s), and other factors influence whether primary care practices engage in improvement efforts. Conclusions Most primary care practices are caught in a cross fire between two groups of pressures: a set of forces that push practices to remain with the status quo, the 15-minute per patient approach, and another set of forces that press for major transformations. Our study illuminates the elements involved in the decision to stay with the status quo or to engage in practice improvement efforts needed for transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 416
页数:19
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Anderson G, 2010, MULTINATIONAL COMP H
[2]   The Future of Primary Care: Transforming Practice [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (20) :2086-+
[3]  
Creswell J. W, 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches
[4]  
Donaldson L., 2001, CONTINGENCY THEORY O
[5]   The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Practice Systems in Primary Care [J].
Dugan, Donna Pillittere ;
Mick, Stephen S. ;
Scholle, Sarah Hudson ;
Steidle, Ernie F. ;
Goldberg, Debora Goetz .
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 34 (01) :47-56
[6]  
Fernald DH, 2011, FAM MED, V43, P503
[7]  
Glaser B. G., 1965, Theoretical Sensitivity, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203793206
[8]   Medical Home Infrastructure: Effect of the Environment and Practice Characteristics on Adoption in Virginia [J].
Goldberg, Debora Goetz ;
Mick, Stephen S. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2010, 67 (04) :431-449
[9]   Elements of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Family Practices in Virginia [J].
Goldberg, Debora Goetz ;
Kuzel, Anton J. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (04) :301-308
[10]   From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care [J].
Grol, R ;
Grimshaw, J .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9391) :1225-1230