Efficacy and safety of biological agents in patients with giant cell arteritis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:4
作者
Song, Gwan Gyu [1 ]
Lee, Young Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Rheumatol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
tocilizumab; TNF inhibitors; abatacept; giant cell arteritis; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; POLYMYALGIA-RHEUMATICA; MAINTENANCE; TOCILIZUMAB; ASSOCIATION; REMISSION;
D O I
10.5414/CP203738
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of biological agents in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). Materials and methods: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (260 patients and 193 controls) to examine the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and abatacept relative to that of placebo in GCA patients was performed. Results: The remission rate was significantly higher for tocilizumab-treated patients than that for placebo-treated controls (odds ratio (OR) 7.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.854 - 12.75, p < 0.001). In addition, the relapse rate was significantly lower for the tocilizumab group than that for the placebo group (OR 0.222, 95% CI 0.129 - 0.381, p < 0.001). Further, no significant difference in remission and relapse was observed between groups treated with TNF inhibitors, abatacept, and placebo. The number of serious adverse events (SAEs) was significantly lower in tocilizumab-treated patients than that in placebo-treated controls (OR 0.539, 95% CI 0.296 - 0.982, p = 0.044). However, there was no significant difference in SAEs among patients treated with TNF inhibitors, abatacept, and placebo. The infection rate was significantly higher in TNF inhibitor-treated patients than in those treated with placebo (OR 2.407, 95% CI 1.168 - 4.960, p = 0.017), while there was no significant difference in infection rate between individuals treated with tocilizumab. abatacept, and placebo. Conclusion: Tocilizumab was found to be more effective than placebo in GCA patients, but TNF inhibitors and abatacept were not. Further, TNF inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of infection. What is known about this subject - Clinical trials to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of biological agents showed mixed results in patients with GCA. - These results might be attributed to small sample sizes, low statistical power, and/ or clinical heterogeneity in the available studies. What this study adds - There may be a difference in efficacy and safety among biological agents in patients with GCA. - Tocilizumab was more effective than placebo in GCA patients. - TNF inhibitors and abatacept were not more effective that placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 510
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ARTHRITIS RHEUM US
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ANN INTERN MED, DOI DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-146-9-200705010-00004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, STAT MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, LANCET, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00560-2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J RHEUMAT DIS, DOI DOI 10.4078/JRD.2018.25.3.169
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ANN RHEUM DIS, DOI DOI 10.1136/ANNRHEUMDIS-2013-203586
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ANN LAB MED, DOI DOI 10.3343/ALM.2015.35.3.283
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NEW ENGL J MED
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ARTHRITIS RHEUM