Differential response of Mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)

被引:86
|
作者
López-Pérez, JA
Le Strange, M
Kaloshian, I
Ploeg, AT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Nematol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] UCCE, Tulare, CA 93274 USA
关键词
tomato; Lycopersicon esculentum; root-knot nematode; Meloidogyne; rootstock; grafting;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2005.07.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Non-grafted nematode-susceptible tomatoes and tomatoes grafted onto the Mi-gene nematode-resistant rootstock cultivar Beaufort were grown under a range of Meloidogyne incognita population densities in pots in a greenhouse. Under high nematode densities, yields on resistant rootstocks were higher, and galling and root nematode densities at the final harvest were lower. However, galling and nematode levels on resistant rootstocks were still high, and did not correspond to a resistant response. In a second experiment possible reasons for this response, such as virulence of the nematode population used, a low inherent resistance level of the rootstock, or effect of the scion on the rootstock, were evaluated. The results from the second experiment showed that three different M. incognita populations that were used all behaved similar, and therefore the possibility of a virulent population was excluded. There was no influence of the susceptible scion on the resistant rootstock. Two different resistant rootstocks that were used in the second experiment both retained yields under high nematode densities, but exhibited big differences in root galling and final nematode populations. It is concluded that there are big differences between Mi-gene-resistant tomato cultivars as far as nematode host status, and that some should be considered tolerant rather than resistant. The choice of rootstock cultivar can have important consequences for the performance of a subsequent nematode susceptible crop. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 388
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resistant rootstocks for managing root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) in grafted watermelon and melon
    Thies, J. A.
    Ariss, J. J.
    Hassell, R. L.
    Levi, A.
    CUCURBITACEAE 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE XTH EUCARPIA MEETING ON GENETICS AND BREEDING OF CUCURBITACEAE, 2012, : 202 - 211
  • [2] Transmission of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne incognita, to tomato by Helix aspersa
    Sanchez, K. R.
    Caswell-Chen, E. P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 105 (11) : 122 - 122
  • [3] STRAINS OF TOMATO RESISTANT TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES (MELOIDOGYNE SPP)
    SHIVASHANKAR, G
    REDDY, DDR
    SETTY, KGH
    RAJENDRA, BR
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1975, 44 (07): : 241 - 241
  • [4] Variation in resistance to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in tomato genotypes bearing the Mi gene
    Jacquet, M
    Bongiovanni, M
    Martinez, M
    Verschave, P
    Wajnberg, E
    Castagnone-Sereno, P
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2005, 54 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [6] Screening Selected Solanum Plants as Potential Rootstocks for the Management of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)
    Okorley, Benjamin A.
    Agyeman, Charles
    Amissah, Naalamle
    Nyaku, Seloame T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2018, 2018
  • [7] The Feeding Behavior of Adult Root-knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) in Rose Balsam and Tomato
    Miyashita, Nao
    Yabu, Tetsuo
    Kurihara, Takayuki
    Koga, Hironori
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2014, 46 (03) : 296 - 301
  • [8] CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TOMATO CULTIVARS RESISTANT TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES (MELOIDOGYNE SPP)
    SINGH, B
    CHOUDHUR.B
    NEMATOLOGICA, 1973, 19 (04): : 443 - 448
  • [9] GRAFTING FOR MANAGEMENT OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA, IN TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.)
    Owusu, S. B.
    Kwoseh, C. K.
    Starr, J. L.
    Davies, F. T.
    NEMATROPICA, 2016, 46 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [10] Resistance mechanisms of Prunus rootstocks to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita
    Ye, Hang
    Wang, Wen-jun
    Liu, Guo-jie
    Zhu, Li-xin
    Jia, Ke-gong
    FRUITS, 2009, 64 (05) : 295 - 303