Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:246
作者
Johnson, David C. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Raman, Steven S. [3 ]
Mirak, Sohrab A. [3 ]
Kwan, Lorna [2 ]
Bajgiran, Amirhossein M. [3 ]
Hsu, William [3 ]
Maehara, Cleo K. [3 ]
Ahuja, Preeti [3 ]
Faiena, Izak [2 ]
Pooli, Aydin [2 ]
Salmasi, Amirali [2 ]
Sisk, Anthony [4 ]
Felker, Ely R. [3 ]
Lu, David S. K. [3 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs, Natl Clinician Scholars Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Multifocal; Multiparametric magnetic; resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Whole-mount pathology; ULTRASOUND FUSION; RISK STRATIFICATION; TARGETED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) undoubtedly affects the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer (CaP). However, clinicians need a better understanding of its accuracy and limitations in detecting individual CaP foci to optimize management. Objective: To determine the per-lesion detection rate for CaP foci by mpMRI and identify predictors of tumor detection. Design, setting, and participants: We carried out a retrospective analysis of a prospectively managed database correlating lesion-specific results from mpMRI co-registered with whole-mount pathology (WMP) prostatectomy specimens from June 2010 to February 2018. Participants include 588 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven CaP undergoing 3-T mpMRI before radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary institution. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We measured mpMRI sensitivity in detecting individual CaP and clinically significant (any Gleason score >= 7) CaP foci and predictors of tumor detection using multivariate analysis. Results and limitations: The final analysis included 1213 pathologically confirmed tumor foci in 588 patients with primarily intermediate- (75%) or high-risk (12%) CaP. mpMRI detected 45% of all lesions (95% confidence interval [CI] 42-47%), including 65% of clinically significant lesions (95% CI 61-69%) and nearly 80% of high-grade tumors. Some 74% and 31% of missed solitary and multifocal tumors, respectively, were clinically significant. The majority of missed lesions were small (61.1% <= 1 cm); 28.3% were between 1 and 2 cm, and 10.4% were >2 cm. mpMRI missed at least one clinically significant focus in 34% of patients overall, and in 45% of men with multifocal lesions. On multivariate analysis, smaller, low-grade, multifocal, non-index tumors with lower prostate-specific antigen density were more likely to be missed. Limitations include selection bias in a prostatectomy cohort, lack of specificity data, an imperfect co-registration process, and uncertain clinical significance for undetected lesions. Conclusions: mpMRI detects less than half of all and less than two-thirds of clinically significant CaP foci. The moderate per-lesion sensitivity and significant proportion of men with undetected tumor foci demonstrate the current limitations of mpMRI. Patient summary: Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate before surgical removal for prostate cancer finds less than half of all individual prostate cancer tumors. Large, solitary, aggressive tumors are more likely to be visualized on imaging. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 720
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]  
American College of Radiology, 2015, PI RADS PROST IM REP
[3]   What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate [J].
Borofsky, Samuel ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Gaur, Sonia ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Greer, Matthew D. ;
Mertan, Francesca V. ;
Taffel, Myles ;
Moreno, Vanesa ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) :186-195
[4]   Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study [J].
Bratan, Flavie ;
Niaf, Emilie ;
Melodelima, Christelle ;
Chesnais, Anne Laure ;
Souchon, Remi ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Rouviere, Olivier .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) :2019-2029
[5]   Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study [J].
Catto, J. W. F. ;
Robinson, M. C. ;
Albertsen, P. C. ;
Goepel, J. R. ;
Abbod, M. F. ;
Linkens, D. A. ;
Davis, M. ;
Rosario, D. J. ;
Warren, A. Y. ;
Varma, M. ;
Griffiths, D. F. ;
Grigor, K. M. ;
Mayer, N. J. ;
Oxley, J. D. ;
Deshmukh, N. S. ;
Lane, J. A. ;
Metcalfe, C. ;
Donovan, J. L. ;
Neal, D. E. ;
Hamdy, F. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 105 (07) :931-937
[6]   Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (02) :233-245
[7]   Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value [J].
Felker, Ely R. ;
Wu, Jason ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Raman, Steven S. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Dorey, Fred ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05) :1421-1427
[8]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[9]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Frye, Thomas P. ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Kilchevsky, Amichai ;
Maruf, Mahir ;
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj ;
Kongnyuy, Michael ;
Muthigi, Akhil ;
Han, Hui ;
Parnes, Howard L. ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Brad ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03) :640-646
[10]   Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
De Visschere, Pieter ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Thoeny, Harriet ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Villers, Arnauld .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) :1045-1053