The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Hong, J. S. -Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brown, K. G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Waller, J. [3 ]
Young, C. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solomon, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Inst Acad Surg RPA, Missenden Rd,POB M40, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth & Med, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Pelvimetry; Magnetic resonance imaging; RECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The difficulty of performing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer partly relies on the surgeon's subjective assessment of the individual patient's pelvic anatomy and tumour characteristics, which generally influences the choice of platform used (open, laparoscopic, robotic or trans-anal surgery). Recent studies have found associations between several anatomical pelvic measurements and surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing data reporting the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvic measurements to predict technical difficulty and outcomes of TME, and determine whether pelvimetry could optimise patient-specific selection of a particular surgical approach. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies reporting MRI-based pelvic measurements in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer, and the effect of these measurements on surgical difficulty. Results Eleven studies reporting the association between MRI-pelvimetry measurements and rectal cancer surgical outcomes were included. Indicators for surgical difficulty used in the included studies were involved circumferential resection margin, longer operative time, incomplete TME, higher blood loss, anastomotic leak, conversion to open surgery and overall complications. Bony pelvic measurements which were associated with increased surgical difficulty in more than one study were a smaller interspinous distance, a smaller intertubercle distance, a smaller pelvic inlet and larger pubic tubercle height. Two studies identified larger mesorectal fat area as a predictor of surgical difficulty. Conclusions Bony pelvic measurements may predict surgical difficulty during TME, however, use of different indicators of difficulty limit comparison between studies. Early data suggest MRI soft tissue measurements may predict surgical difficulty and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1000
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Hilst, Jony
    Korrel, Maarten
    de Rooij, Thijs
    Lof, Sanne
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Kooby, David A.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Abu Hilal, Mo
    Besselink, Marc G.
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (05): : 719 - 727
  • [42] Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Khan, Nickalus R.
    Clark, Aaron J.
    Lee, Siang Liao
    Venable, Garrett T.
    Rossi, Nicholas B.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 (06) : 847 - 874
  • [43] Commentary on “Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision”, published in BMC Cancer 2016 Jul 4;16(1):380. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5
    A. Martínez-Pérez
    F. Brunetti
    N. de’Angelis
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 799 - 800
  • [44] Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
    Smith, Toby O.
    Blake, Vicky
    Hing, Caroline B.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (02) : 173 - 184
  • [45] The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence
    Ricciardi, Rocco
    Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
    Yankovsky, Ana
    Dahl, Douglas
    Auchincloss, Hugh
    Patel, Neera M.
    Hebert, April E.
    Wright, Valena
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2025, 281 (05) : 748 - 763
  • [46] A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Conventional Instrumentation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alcelik, Iihan A.
    Blomfield, Mark I.
    Diana, Givanni
    Gibbon, Anthony J.
    Carrington, Nick
    Burr, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (02) : 410 - 418
  • [47] Trans-anal or trans-abdominal total mesorectal excision? A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent comparative studies on perioperative outcomes and pathological result
    Lei, PuRun
    Ruan, Ying
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    Fang, Jiafeng
    Chen, Tufeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 60 : 113 - 119
  • [48] Short-term outcomes in minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy: the differences between East and West. A systematic review of the literature
    van der Wielen, Nicole
    Straatman, Jennifer
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    Daams, Freek
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [49] Cost analysis and cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: a protocol for a systematic review
    Geitenbeek, Ritchie T. J.
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    Broekman, Mark
    Schop, Bram P. A.
    Lieverse, Tom G. F.
    Hompes, Roel
    Havenga, Klaas
    Postma, Maarten
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [50] Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    C. La Raja
    C. Foppa
    A. Maroli
    C. Kontovounisios
    N. Ben David
    M. Carvello
    A. Spinelli
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2022, 26 : 603 - 613