The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Hong, J. S. -Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brown, K. G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Waller, J. [3 ]
Young, C. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solomon, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Inst Acad Surg RPA, Missenden Rd,POB M40, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth & Med, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Pelvimetry; Magnetic resonance imaging; RECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The difficulty of performing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer partly relies on the surgeon's subjective assessment of the individual patient's pelvic anatomy and tumour characteristics, which generally influences the choice of platform used (open, laparoscopic, robotic or trans-anal surgery). Recent studies have found associations between several anatomical pelvic measurements and surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing data reporting the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvic measurements to predict technical difficulty and outcomes of TME, and determine whether pelvimetry could optimise patient-specific selection of a particular surgical approach. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies reporting MRI-based pelvic measurements in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer, and the effect of these measurements on surgical difficulty. Results Eleven studies reporting the association between MRI-pelvimetry measurements and rectal cancer surgical outcomes were included. Indicators for surgical difficulty used in the included studies were involved circumferential resection margin, longer operative time, incomplete TME, higher blood loss, anastomotic leak, conversion to open surgery and overall complications. Bony pelvic measurements which were associated with increased surgical difficulty in more than one study were a smaller interspinous distance, a smaller intertubercle distance, a smaller pelvic inlet and larger pubic tubercle height. Two studies identified larger mesorectal fat area as a predictor of surgical difficulty. Conclusions Bony pelvic measurements may predict surgical difficulty during TME, however, use of different indicators of difficulty limit comparison between studies. Early data suggest MRI soft tissue measurements may predict surgical difficulty and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1000
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes
    Hess, Nicholas R.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Levy, Ryan M.
    Christie, Neil A.
    Luketich, James D.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 5 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [32] Functional outcomes and quality of life following open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Geitenbeek, Ritch T. J.
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    Moes, Carmen A.
    Hompes, Roel
    Ranchor, Adelita V.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (08): : 4431 - 4444
  • [33] Outcomes and complications following minimally invasive excision of synovial cysts of the lumbar spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garg, Kanwaljeet
    Kasliwal, Manish K.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 206
  • [34] Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamedahmed, A. Y. Y.
    Zaman, S.
    Wuheb, A. A.
    Ismail, A.
    Nnaji, M.
    Alyamani, A. A.
    Eltyeb, H. A.
    Yassin, N. A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [35] Minimally-invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation: systematic review and metanalysis of short-term outcomes
    Roesel, Raffaello
    Bernardi, Lorenzo
    Bonino, Marco A.
    Popeskou, Sotirios G.
    Garofalo, Fabio
    Cristaudi, Alessandra
    HPB, 2023, 25 (06) : 603 - 613
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short-Term Outcomes and Completeness of Resection
    Straatman, Jennifer
    van der Wielen, Nicole
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
    Jansma, Elise P.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [37] Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes
    Guerra, Francesco
    Giuliani, Giuseppe
    Bencini, Lapo
    Bianchi, Paolo P.
    Coratti, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (07) : 1509 - 1516
  • [38] Comparison of Short-Term Clinical and Pathological Outcomes after Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Anterior Rectal Resection Due to Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
    Czerwinska, Agata
    Zarzycki, Piotr
    Malczak, Piotr
    Nowakowski, Michal
    Major, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (11)
  • [39] Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wong, Nicky Zhun Hong
    Yap, Dominic Wei Ting
    Ng, Sherryl Lei
    Ng, Junie Yu Ning
    James, Juanita Jaslin
    Kow, Alfred Wei Chieh
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [40] Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Xin
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Rui, Gang
    Chen, Chien-Min
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Wu, Hua-Jian
    Zhang, Huang-Lin
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 41 - 52