The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Hong, J. S. -Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brown, K. G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Waller, J. [3 ]
Young, C. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solomon, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Inst Acad Surg RPA, Missenden Rd,POB M40, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth & Med, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Pelvimetry; Magnetic resonance imaging; RECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The difficulty of performing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer partly relies on the surgeon's subjective assessment of the individual patient's pelvic anatomy and tumour characteristics, which generally influences the choice of platform used (open, laparoscopic, robotic or trans-anal surgery). Recent studies have found associations between several anatomical pelvic measurements and surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing data reporting the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvic measurements to predict technical difficulty and outcomes of TME, and determine whether pelvimetry could optimise patient-specific selection of a particular surgical approach. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies reporting MRI-based pelvic measurements in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer, and the effect of these measurements on surgical difficulty. Results Eleven studies reporting the association between MRI-pelvimetry measurements and rectal cancer surgical outcomes were included. Indicators for surgical difficulty used in the included studies were involved circumferential resection margin, longer operative time, incomplete TME, higher blood loss, anastomotic leak, conversion to open surgery and overall complications. Bony pelvic measurements which were associated with increased surgical difficulty in more than one study were a smaller interspinous distance, a smaller intertubercle distance, a smaller pelvic inlet and larger pubic tubercle height. Two studies identified larger mesorectal fat area as a predictor of surgical difficulty. Conclusions Bony pelvic measurements may predict surgical difficulty during TME, however, use of different indicators of difficulty limit comparison between studies. Early data suggest MRI soft tissue measurements may predict surgical difficulty and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1000
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does previous transanal excision for early rectal cancer impair surgical outcomes and pathologic findings of completion total mesorectal excision? Results of a systematic review of the literature
    Eid, Y.
    Alves, A.
    Lubrano, J.
    Menahem, B.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2018, 155 (06) : 445 - 452
  • [22] Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Choy, Kay T.
    Yang, Tze Wei Wilson
    Prabhakaran, Swetha
    Heriot, Alexander
    Kong, Joseph C.
    Warrier, Satish K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (06) : 1163 - 1174
  • [23] Important outcomes for transanal total mesorectal excision in a Canadian population after using transanal minimally invasive surgery (flexible) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (rigid) platforms
    Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio
    Karimuddin, Ahmer
    Caswell, Joseph
    Raval, Manoj
    Conlon, Michael
    Phang, Terry
    Brown, Carl
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2020, 5
  • [24] Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, open surgery, and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An overview of systematic reviews
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2020, 4 (06): : 628 - 634
  • [25] Short-term Outcomes of Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
    Wu, Zhiyuan
    Zhou, Wenlong
    Chen, Fu
    Wang, Wentao
    Feng, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (02): : 341 - 354
  • [26] A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?
    J. W. Butterworth
    W. A. Butterworth
    J. Meyer
    C. Giacobino
    N. Buchs
    F. Ris
    R. Scarpinata
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 1183 - 1198
  • [27] A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?
    Butterworth, J. W.
    Butterworth, W. A.
    Meyer, J.
    Giacobino, C.
    Buchs, N.
    Ris, F.
    Scarpinata, R.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (11) : 1183 - 1198
  • [28] Pathological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Jiang, Hong-Peng
    Li, Yan-Sen
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Chang
    Liu, Fan
    Shen, Zhan-Long
    Ye, Ying-Jiang
    Wang, Shan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2632 - 2642
  • [29] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    I. Alimova
    S. Chernyshov
    M. Nagudov
    E. Rybakov
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 901 - 913
  • [30] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alimova, I
    Chernyshov, S.
    Nagudov, M.
    Rybakov, E.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (08) : 901 - 913