The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Hong, J. S. -Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brown, K. G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Waller, J. [3 ]
Young, C. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solomon, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Inst Acad Surg RPA, Missenden Rd,POB M40, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth & Med, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Mesorectal excision; Rectal cancer; Pelvimetry; Magnetic resonance imaging; RECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The difficulty of performing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer partly relies on the surgeon's subjective assessment of the individual patient's pelvic anatomy and tumour characteristics, which generally influences the choice of platform used (open, laparoscopic, robotic or trans-anal surgery). Recent studies have found associations between several anatomical pelvic measurements and surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing data reporting the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvic measurements to predict technical difficulty and outcomes of TME, and determine whether pelvimetry could optimise patient-specific selection of a particular surgical approach. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies reporting MRI-based pelvic measurements in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer, and the effect of these measurements on surgical difficulty. Results Eleven studies reporting the association between MRI-pelvimetry measurements and rectal cancer surgical outcomes were included. Indicators for surgical difficulty used in the included studies were involved circumferential resection margin, longer operative time, incomplete TME, higher blood loss, anastomotic leak, conversion to open surgery and overall complications. Bony pelvic measurements which were associated with increased surgical difficulty in more than one study were a smaller interspinous distance, a smaller intertubercle distance, a smaller pelvic inlet and larger pubic tubercle height. Two studies identified larger mesorectal fat area as a predictor of surgical difficulty. Conclusions Bony pelvic measurements may predict surgical difficulty during TME, however, use of different indicators of difficulty limit comparison between studies. Early data suggest MRI soft tissue measurements may predict surgical difficulty and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1000
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review
    J. S.-Y. Hong
    K. G. M. Brown
    J. Waller
    C. J. Young
    M. J. Solomon
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 991 - 1000
  • [2] Author's reply to commentary on "The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review"
    Hong, J. S. -Y.
    Brown, K. G. M.
    Waller, J.
    Young, C. J.
    Solomon, M. J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (08) : 983 - 983
  • [3] MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer
    Chen, Jianhua
    Sun, Yanwu
    Chi, Pan
    Sun, Bin
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (07) : 1144 - 1151
  • [4] Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review
    Curtis, N. J.
    Davids, J.
    Foster, J. D.
    Francis, N. K.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (04) : 259 - 268
  • [5] Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review
    N. J. Curtis
    J. Davids
    J. D. Foster
    N. K. Francis
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2017, 21 : 259 - 268
  • [6] Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision
    Sajid, Muhammad Shafique
    Ahamd, Adil
    Miles, William F. A.
    Baig, Mirza Khurrum
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 6 (05): : 209 - 219
  • [7] MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer
    Jianhua Chen
    Yanwu Sun
    Pan Chi
    Bin Sun
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 1144 - 1151
  • [8] Outcomes of completion total mesorectal excision are not compromised by prior transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Clermonts, S. H. E. M.
    Koeter, T.
    Pottel, H.
    Stassen, L. P. S.
    Wasowicz, D. K.
    Zimmerman, D. D. E.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (07) : 790 - 798
  • [9] Deep learning-based pelvimetry in pelvic MRI volumes for pre-operative difficulty assessment of total mesorectal excision
    Baltus, Simon C.
    Geitenbeek, Ritch T. J.
    Frieben, Maike
    Thibeau-Sutre, Elina
    Wolterink, Jelmer M.
    Tan, Can O.
    Vermeulen, Matthijs C.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    Broeders, Ivo A. M. J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (03): : 1536 - 1543
  • [10] Beyond total mesorectal excision: The emerging role of minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Perini, Davina
    Cammelli, Francesca
    Scheiterle, Maximilian
    Martellucci, Jacopo
    Di Bella, Annamaria
    Bergamini, Carlo
    Prosperi, Paolo
    Giordano, Alessio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (08):