A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills

被引:42
作者
Yagci, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahi Evran Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, TR-40100 Kirsehir, Turkey
关键词
Computational thinking; Problem solving; Algorithmic thinking; Teaching & learning strategies; SOLVING SELF-APPRAISAL; CREATIVITY; ROBOTICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to develop a scale which can be used to measure the computational thinking skills (CTS) of high school students. Validity and reliability testing of the scale was performed with the participation of 785 students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-point Likert scale had a construct consisting of four factors Problem-solving, Cooperative Learning & Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Algorithmic Thinking expressed by 42 items. The factor loadings of the scale varied from .475 to .853. The confirmatory factor analysis performed to reveal the factorial validity of the scale showed that the Chi-square value (2=2679.07; sd=815, p=0.00) was significant. The fitness index values were found to be RMSA=.0075; SRMR=.081; NNFI=.91; CFI=.92; GFI=.90; and AGFI=.88. The Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficient was .969 for the overall scale. In addition, the stability of the scale was examined to obtain information about its reliability and the test-re-test method was used. It was concluded as a result of the analysis that the scale was a valid and reliable measurement tool which can be used to measure the CTS of high school students.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 951
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining computational thinking processes in modeling unstructured data
    Jiang, Shiyan
    Qian, Yingxiao
    Tang, Hengtao
    Yalcinkaya, Rabia
    Rose, Carolyn P.
    Chao, Jie
    Finzer, William
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (04) : 4309 - 4333
  • [32] Examining computational thinking processes in modeling unstructured data
    Shiyan Jiang
    Yingxiao Qian
    Hengtao Tang
    Rabia Yalcinkaya
    Carolyn P. Rosé
    Jie Chao
    William Finzer
    Education and Information Technologies, 2023, 28 : 4309 - 4333
  • [33] Development and Validation of the Computational Thinking Concepts and Skills Test
    Peteranetz, Markeya S.
    Morrow, Patrick M.
    Soh, Leen-Kiat
    SIGCSE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, : 926 - 932
  • [34] Retrieval Practices Enhance Computational and Scientific Thinking Skills
    Yasar, Osman
    Maliekal, Jose
    Veronesi, Peter
    Little, Leigh
    Meise, Michael
    Yeter, Ibrahim H.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] TEACHING CONTENT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SKILLS IMPLEMENTATION
    Juskeviciene, A.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 1364 - 1372
  • [36] Enhancing Computational Thinking Skills for New Mexico Schools
    Perez, Alfredo J.
    Hurtado, Ivan Lopez
    Crichigno, Jorge
    Peralta, Raul R.
    Torres, David
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [37] Exploring Computational Thinking Skills Training Through Augmented Reality and AIoT Learning
    Lin, Yu-Shan
    Chen, Shih-Yeh
    Tsai, Chia-Wei
    Lai, Ying-Hsun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [38] Debugging in Computational Thinking: A Meta-analysis on the Effects of Interventions on Debugging Skills
    Sun, Chen
    Yang, Stephanie
    Becker, Betsy
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2024, 62 (04) : 1087 - 1121
  • [39] Integration of Computational Thinking Skills in STEM-Driven Computer Science Education
    Burbaite, Renata
    Drasute, Vida
    Stuikys, Vytautas
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON) - EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGES OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, : 1824 - 1832
  • [40] Effectiveness of a Computational Thinking (CS0) Course on Student Analytical Skills
    Van Dyne, Michele
    Braun, Jeffrey
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), 2014, : 133 - 137