A Cost Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapy for Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia

被引:0
作者
Shah, Neel T. [1 ]
Barroilhet, Lisa [1 ]
Berkowitz, Ross S. [1 ]
Goldstein, Donald P. [1 ]
Horowitz, Neil [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, New England Trophoblast Dis Ctr,Med Sch, Donald P Goldstein MD Trophoblast Dis Registry,Da, Div Gynecol Oncol,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Brigham &, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
chemotherapy; cost analysis; gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; SINGLE-AGENT CHEMOTHERAPY; ACTINOMYCIN-D; FOLINIC ACID; METHOTREXATE; DISEASE; THERAPY; RESISTANCE; REGIMEN; TUMORS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal approach to first-line treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) using a cost analysis of 3 commonly used regimens. STUDY DESIGN: A decision tree of the 3 most commonly used first-line low-risk GTN treatment strategies was created, accounting for toxicities, response rates and need for second- or third-line therapy. These strategies included 8-day methotrexate (MTX)/folinic acid, weekly MTX, and pulsed actinomycin-D (act-D). Response rates, average number of cycles needed for remission, and toxicities were determined by review of the literature. Costs of each strategy were examined from a societal perspective, including the direct total treatment costs as well as the indirect lost labor production costs from work absences. Sensitivity analysis on these costs was performed using both deterministic and probabilistic cost-minimization models with the aid of decision tree software (TreeAge Pro 2011, TreeAge Inc., Williamstown, Massachusetts). RESULTS: We found that 8-day MTX/folinic acid is the least expensive to society, followed by pulsed act-D ($4,867 vs. $6,111 average societal cost per cure, respectively), with act-D becoming more favorable only with act-D per-cycle cost <$231, or response rate to first-line therapy >99%. Weekly MTX is the most expensive first-line treatment strategy to society ($9,089 average cost per cure), despite being least expensive to administer per cycle, based on lower first-line response rate. Absolute societal cost of each strategy is driven by the probability of needing expensive third-line multiagent chemotherapy, however relative cost differences are robust to sensitivity analysis over the reported range of cycle number and response rate for all therapies. CONCLUSION: Based on similar efficacy and lower societal cost, we recommend 8-day MTX/folinic acid for first-line treatment of low-risk GTN. (J Reprod Med 2012;57:211-218)
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hysterectomy versus chemotherapy for low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mitric, Cristina
    Sayyid, Rashid K.
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Hong, Nicole J. Look
    Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 187 : 30 - 36
  • [22] Comparison of methotrexate, actinomycin D, and etoposide for treating low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Baptista, Angela M.
    Belfort, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 119 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [23] The 16-year experience in treating low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients with failed primary methotrexate chemotherapy
    Wu, Xiaodong
    Qin, Jiale
    Shen, Tao
    Fei, Weidong
    Chen, Lili
    Xie, Xing
    Lu, Weiguo
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 1 - 11
  • [24] Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Actinomycin D Versus Methotrexate-Folinic Acid in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Lertkhachonsuk, Arb-aroon
    Hanvoravongchai, Piya
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 61 (5-6) : 230 - 234
  • [25] Lung metastases in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study
    Frijstein, M. M.
    Lok, C. A. R.
    van Trommel, N. E.
    ten Kate-Booij, M. J.
    Massuger, L. F. A. G.
    van Werkhoven, E.
    Short, D.
    Aguiar, X.
    Fisher, R. A.
    Kaur, B.
    Sarwar, N.
    Sebire, N. J.
    Seckl, M. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [26] Actinomycin D for Methotrexate-Failed Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Lurain, John R.
    Chapman-Davis, Eloise
    Hoekstra, Anna V.
    Schink, Julian C.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 57 (7-8) : 283 - 287
  • [27] Challenges in the Treatment of Low-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Braga, Antonio
    Elias, Kevin M.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 43 (07): : 503 - 506
  • [28] Eight days versus weekly intramuscular methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Anfinan, N. M.
    Al Khatieb, M. T.
    Sait, H. K.
    Sait, M. K.
    Baghlaf, O. A.
    Mousa, A. A.
    Sait, K. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (02) : 227 - 232
  • [29] Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy
    Chapman-Davis, Eloise
    Hoekstra, Anna V.
    Rademaker, Alfred W.
    Schink, Julian C.
    Lurain, John R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (03) : 572 - 575
  • [30] The first-line therapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Does single agent or multi-agent work?
    Cheng, Nai-Ming
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 58 (05): : 585 - 586