Prices versus nudges: What matters for search versus purchase of energy investments?

被引:20
作者
Holladay, Scott [1 ,2 ]
LaRiviere, Jacob [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Novgorodsky, David [4 ]
Price, Michael [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Econ, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Baker Ctr Publ Policy, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Microsoft, Off Chief Economist, 14865 NE 36th St, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[6] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Information; Social comparison; Public goods; Durable goods; SOCIAL COMPARISONS; FIELD EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.12.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We report the results of a field experiment where we exogenously vary the use of social comparison "nudges" and subsidies for participation in an in-home energy audit program. We follow subjects through to subsequent purchase of durable goods. We therefore can compare the causal effect of financial incentives and nudges along two margins: audits, which we liken to search, and purchase of durables. Using data on nearly 100,000 households we document that both prices and nudges cause a statistically significant increase in audits. Comparing point estimates, effective nudges are worth roughly $50-$70. However, we find that neither nudges nor subsidies do not significantly impact installations. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 173
页数:23
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据