Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme

被引:49
作者
Stedenfeldt, M. [1 ,2 ]
Oian, P. [2 ,3 ]
Gissler, M. [4 ,5 ]
Blix, E. [2 ,6 ]
Pirhonen, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Norway, Norwegian Continence & Pelv Floor Ctr, N-9038 Tromso, Norway
[2] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Med, Womens Hlth & Perinatol Res Grp, Tromso, Norway
[3] Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, N-9038 Tromso, Norway
[4] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf THL, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Nord Sch Publ Hlth, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Clin Res, N-9038 Tromso, Norway
关键词
Low-risk deliveries; manual assistance; obstetric anal sphincter injuries; risk factors; DELIVERY; TEARS; EPISIOTOMY; RUPTURE; WOMEN; FREQUENCY; PROTECTS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12274
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the risk profile of sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and associated risks in five risk groups (low to high), after the OASIS rate was reduced from 4.6% to 2.0% following an interventional programme. The main focus of the intervention was on manual assistance during the final part of second stage of labour. DesignA multicentre interventional cohort study with before and after comparison. SettingFour Norwegian obstetric departments. SampleA total of 40154 vaginal deliveries in 2003-09. MethodsPre-intervention and postintervention analyses. The associations of OASIS with possible risk factors were estimated using odds ratios obtained by logistic regression. Main outcome measureRisk factors of OASIS. ResultsThe risk of sustaining OASIS decreased by 59% (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.36-0.46) after the intervention. Associations with obstetric risks for OASIS were largely unchanged after the intervention, including first vaginal delivery (OR 3.84; 95% CI 2.90-5.07), birthweight 4500g (OR 4.42; 95% CI 2.68-7.27), forceps delivery (OR 3.54; 95% CI 1.99-6.29) and mediolateral episiotomy (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.70-1.12). However, the highest reduction of OASIS, (65%), was observed in group 0 (low-risk) (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.24-0.51), and a 57% (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.35-0.52), 61% (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.31-0.48), and 58% (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30-0.60) reduction in groups with one, two and three risk factors, respectively. No change was observed in the group with four risk factors. ConclusionAfter the intervention the most significant decrease of OASIS was observed in low-risk births, although the main risk factors for OASIS remained unchanged.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures -: a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial
    Altman, Daniel
    Ragnar, Inga
    Ekstroem, Asa
    Tyden, Tanja
    Olsson, Sven-Eric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [2] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: A prospective study
    Andrews, V
    Sultan, AH
    Thakar, R
    Jones, PW
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2006, 33 (02): : 117 - 122
  • [3] A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System
    Baghestan, Elham
    Bordahl, Per E.
    Rasmussen, Svein A.
    Sande, Anne K.
    Lyslo, Ingvill
    Solvang, Isabel
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (02) : 205 - 209
  • [4] Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Norway
    Baghestan, Elham
    Irgens, Lorentz M.
    Bordahl, Per E.
    Rasmussen, Svein
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [5] Bodner-Adler B, 2003, J REPROD MED, V48, P239
  • [6] Episiotomy for vaginal birth
    Carroli, Guillermo
    Mignini, Luciano
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [7] Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    de Wit, C.
    Kuijken, J. P. J. A.
    Bruinse, H. W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [8] The influence of a mediolateral episiotomy during an operative vaginal delivery on the risk for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS)
    de Vogel, Joey
    van Beek, Anneke
    Gietelink, Dirk
    Vujkovic, Marijana
    de Leeuw, Jan Willem
    Papatsonis, Dimitri
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S43 - S43
  • [9] Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery
    FitzGerald, Mary P.
    Weber, Anne M.
    Howden, Nancy
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    Brown, Mort B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [10] Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed?
    Frankman, Elizabeth A.
    Wang, Li
    Bunker, Clareann H.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (05) : 573.e1 - 573.e7