Sparse representation method based on Gabor and CLBP

被引:3
作者
Wang, Xiaolong [1 ]
Zhu, Qi [1 ]
Cui, Jinrong [1 ]
Wang, Yuewu [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Key Lab Urban Planning & Decis Making Si, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
OPTIK | 2013年 / 124卷 / 22期
关键词
Face recognition; Gabor wavelet; Local binary pattern; Sparse representation; FACE RECOGNITION; HISTOGRAM; PATTERNS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.05.002
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Sparse representation method (SRM) is a state-of-the-art face recognition method. Nevertheless, SRM exploits image samples rather than image features to perform classification. As we know, the proper feature of the image can be more discriminative than the image sample itself. For example, Gabor and local binary pattern (LBP), two kinds of widely used features, have shown excellent discriminative performance in face recognition. Recently a number of experiments have shown that complete local binary pattern (CLBP) obtains a much better result than LBP in recognizing the texture images. With this paper, we propose a novel sparse representation method based on Gabor and CLBP features for face recognition. Our method first extracts the most discriminative features and then uses SRM to perform face recognition. The proposed method is composed of the following steps: the first step is to perform the histogram equalization operation on the image samples. The second step extracts the Gabor and CLBP features from the image samples. The last step uses the sparse representation method based on the combination of Gabor and CLBP features to perform classification. The rationales of our method are as follows: the first step can reduce the adverse effects caused by the variable illuminations. Both of the Gabor and CLBP features not only are very discriminative but also are complementary. A large number of experiments show the superior performance of our method. For the Feret face database, the rate of classification error of our method is 28.8% lower than that of SRM and 14.8% lower than that of LRC. For the ORL face database, the rate of classification error of our method is 9% lower than that of SRM and 9.5% lower than that of LRC. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5843 / 5850
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]  
Lee TS, 1996, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V18, P959, DOI 10.1109/34.541406
[12]  
Lei Yu, 2011, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Image and Graphics (ICIG 2011), P303, DOI 10.1109/ICIG.2011.139
[13]   Face recognition using various scales of discriminant color space transform [J].
Li, Billy Y. L. ;
Liu, Wanquan ;
An, Senjian ;
Krishna, Aneesh ;
Xu, Tianwei .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2012, 94 :68-76
[14]  
Li S.X., 2011, INT C AUT FAC GEST R
[15]   Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced Fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition [J].
Liu, CJ ;
Wechsler, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2002, 11 (04) :467-476
[16]   A facial sparse descriptor for single image based face recognition [J].
Liu, Na ;
Lai, Jian-Huang ;
Zheng, Wei-Shi .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2012, 93 :77-87
[17]  
Luo Y., 2012, OPTIK, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJLE0.2012.08.040
[18]   Linear Regression for Face Recognition [J].
Naseem, Imran ;
Togneri, Roberto ;
Bennamoun, Mohammed .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 32 (11) :2106-2112
[19]   Histogram equalization of vibration fringes in holography [J].
Singh, T ;
Vikram, CS .
OPTIK, 2002, 113 (11) :499-503
[20]   Toward a Practical Face Recognition System: Robust Alignment and Illumination by Sparse Representation [J].
Wagner, Andrew ;
Wright, John ;
Ganesh, Arvind ;
Zhou, Zihan ;
Mobahi, Hossein ;
Ma, Yi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 34 (02) :372-386