Effect of planting density on canopy parameter, yield and water use efficiency of Kinnow mandarin

被引:1
作者
Dalal, R. P. S. [1 ]
Sangwan, A. K. [1 ]
Beniwal, B. S. [1 ]
Sharma, Suneel [1 ]
机构
[1] CCS Haryana Agr Univ, Dept Hort, Hisar 125004, Haryana, India
关键词
Planting density; Kinnow; canopy; yield; water use efficiency; economics; NAVEL ORANGE; TREE; GROWTH; FRUIT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effect of tree spacing on growth performance, yield parameters and water use efficiency of five and six-year-old Kinnow mandarin growing on rough lemon rootstock was studied. Plants were grown at three spacing, 6 m x 6 m, 6 m x 5 m and 6 m x 3 m. Plant growth parameters were not influenced significantly by different planting densities. However, maximum plant height, plant spread, canopy volume, canopy surface area, canopy foot print and trunk cross sectional area was observed under low density planting (6 m x 6 m) and minimum under high density (6 m x 3 m). Maximum crop load (276.64 fruits/plant) and yield (46.65 kg/tree) on per tree basis was found in low density (6 m x 6 m), while resource distribution was found maximum (2.64 fruits/cm(2)tcsa) in 6 m x 5 m spacing. The maximum fruit weight (171.83 g), yield (220.99 tonnes/ha) on unit area basis and water use efficiency (24.72 kg/ha/cm) was observed at a spacing of 6 m x 3 m and minimum values in 6 m x 6 m spacing. Net profit ranged from Rs. 82,904 to Rs. 1,33,417/ha in 6 m x 6 m and 6 m x 3 m spacing. Overall, the closest spacing of 6 m x 3 m may be adopted by the Kinnow growers for getting better productivity, WUE and profit per unit area in the initial years of planting, Le. up to age of six year.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 590
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ARORA R K, 1983, Progressive Horticulture, V15, P17
[2]  
BOSWELL SB, 1970, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V95, P523
[3]  
BOSWELL SB, 1982, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V107, P60
[4]  
Chundawat B. S., 1992, Indian Journal of Horticulture, V49, P134
[5]  
Huang R.F., 1997, S CHINA FRUIT, V26, P5
[6]  
Ingle H. V., 2001, South Indian Horticulture, V49, P16
[7]  
Kumar D, 2012, INDIAN J HORTIC, V69, P328
[8]  
Nawaz M.A., 2007, INT S PROSPECTS HORT, P87
[9]  
Phillips R.L., 1969, CITROGRAPH, V61, P309
[10]  
Phillips R.L., 1969, CITROGRAPH, V61, P291