Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops

被引:107
作者
Barrows, Geoffrey [1 ]
Sexton, Steven [2 ]
Zilberman, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; BT CORN; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT; FOOD SECURITY; IMPACT; HEALTH; PLANTS; PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1257/jep.28.1.99
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For millennia, humans have modified plant genes in order to develop crops best suited for food, fiber, feed, and energy production. Conventional plant breeding remains inherently random and slow, constrained by the availability of desirable traits in closely related plant species. In contrast, agricultural biotechnology employs the modern tools of genetic engineering to reduce uncertainty and breeding time and to transfer traits from more distantly related plants. Critics express concerns that the technology imposes negative environmental effects and jeopardizes the health of those who consume the "frankenfoods." Supporters emphasize potential gains from boosting output and lowering food prices for consumers. They argue that such gains are achieved contemporaneous with the adoption of farming practices that lower agrochemical use and lessen soil. The extensive experience with agricultural biotechnology since 1996 provides ample evidence with which to test the claims of supporters and opponents and to evaluate the prospects of genetic crop engineering. In this paper, we begin with an overview of the adoption of the first generation of agricultural biotechnology crops. We then look at the evidence on the effects of these crops: on output and prices, on the environment, and on consumer health. Finally, we consider intellectual property issues surrounding this new technology.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 119
页数:21
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run
    Alston, Julian M.
    Beddow, Jason M.
    Pardey, Philip G.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5945) : 1209 - 1210
  • [2] [Anonymous], GM CROPS FOOD BIOTEC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, BOT DESIRE PLANTS EY
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, LECT OXF FARM C 3 JA
  • [5] Public sector collaboration for agricultural IP management
    Atkinson, RC
    Beachy, RN
    Conway, G
    Cordova, FA
    Fox, MA
    Holbrook, KA
    Klessig, DF
    McCormick, RL
    McPherson, PM
    Rawlings, HR
    Rapson, R
    Vanderhoef, LN
    Wiley, JD
    Young, CE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5630) : 174 - 175
  • [6] Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union
    Beckmann, Volker
    Soregaroli, Claudio
    Wesseler, Justus
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (05) : 1193 - 1199
  • [7] Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future
    Bennett, Alan B.
    Chi-Ham, Cecilia
    Barrows, Geoffrey
    Sexton, Steven
    Zilberman, David
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 : 249 - 279
  • [8] Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment
    Bennett, R
    Phipps, R
    Strange, A
    Grey, P
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 2 (04) : 273 - 278
  • [9] Regulating insect resistance management:: the case of non-Bt corn refuges in the US
    Bourguet, D
    Desquilbet, M
    Lemarié, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 76 (03) : 210 - 220
  • [10] The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: A review
    Cerdeira, Antonio L.
    Duke, Stephen O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (05) : 1633 - 1658