Ethics of Scientific Research and the Principle of Precaution

被引:0
作者
Tomasevic, Luka [1 ]
Jelicic, Ana [2 ]
机构
[1] Sveuciliste Splitu, Katolicki Bogoslovni Fak, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
[2] Sveuciliste Splitu, Sveucilisni Odjel Forenzicne Znanosti, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
来源
FILOZOFSKA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2012年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
science; ethics; (co)existence; solidarity; care; responsibility; progress; principle of precaution; risk; bioethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
We anticipate the reign of science, and the scientists have already sat on a pedestal. It is right time to ask what are their priorities, are they enhancing the knowledge, or are they gradually converted to managers with a doctorate in natural sciences with questionable ethical and partial scientific reasoning. Postmodern Western culture is devoid of metaphysical foundations and its subjects wish only progress and effectiveness. Life and survival are in the hands of scientific geniuses as well as scientific analphabets which they have absolute confidence in them. On the threshold of the promised but not promising era of post-humanism the sense of interdependence of all creatures is evidently intensified. We are expressing that sense through principle of precaution, bioethical projects and Christian personalistic attitude that calls us to show care and solidarity, to constantly review our attitude to life and correlation to one another but also by seeking for the same.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 260
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Anic Rebeka, 1997, KULTURA SOLIDARNOSTI, P123
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOTECH CENTURY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, UOMO MANIPOLATORE
[4]  
Ben Mitchell C., 2002, CUTTING EDGE BIOETHI, P181
[5]  
Bischofskonferenz Deutschen, 1998, DTSCH BISCH KOM GES
[6]  
Bucci Luca M., 2005, MED MORALE, V4, P799
[7]  
Chiavacci Enrico, 2000, LEZIONI BREVI BIOETI, P117
[8]  
Ciancio Claudio, 1995, CRISI TRADIZIONE PEN, P151
[9]  
Colson Charles W., 2004, HUMAN DIGNITY BIOTEC, P16
[10]  
Comitato Nazionale per la bioetica, PRINC PREC PROF BIOE