Examining the effects of testwiseness in conceptual physics evaluations

被引:16
作者
DeVore, Seth [1 ]
Stewart, John [1 ]
Stewart, Gay [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST; ITEM DISCRIMINATION; CORRECT ANSWERS; TEST-WISENESS; POSITION; PRINCIPLES; TESTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020138
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Testwiseness is defined as the set of cognitive strategies used by a student that is intended to improve his or her score on a test regardless of the test's subject matter. Questions with elements that may be affected by testwiseness are common in physics assessments, even in those which have been extensively validated and widely used as evaluation tools in physics education research. The potential effect of several elements of testwiseness were analyzed for questions in the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Conceptual Survey on Electricity and Magnetism that contain distractors that are predicted to be influenced by testwiseness. This analysis was performed using data sets collected between fall 2001 and spring 2014 at one midwestern U.S. university (including over 9500 students) and between Spring 2011 and Spring 2015 at a second eastern U.S. university (including over 2500 students). Student avoidance of "none of the above" or "zero" distractors was statistically significant. The effect of the position of a distractor on its likelihood to be selected was also significant. The effects of several potential positive and negative testwiseness effects on student scores were also examined by developing two modified versions of the FCI designed to include additional elements related to testwiseness; testwiseness produced little effect post-instruction in student performance on the modified instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Item-writing rules: Collective wisdom [J].
Frey, BB ;
Petersen, S ;
Edwards, LM ;
Pedrotti, JT ;
Peyton, V .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2005, 21 (04) :357-364
[22]   Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses [J].
Hake, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1998, 66 (01) :64-74
[23]  
Haladyna T.M., 1989, APPL MEAS EDUC, V2, P51, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15324818AME02014
[24]  
Hestenes D, 1992, The Physics Teacher, V30, P141, DOI [DOI 10.1119/1.2343497, 10.1119/1.2343497]
[25]  
Hestenes D., 1992, The Physics Teacher, V30, P159, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2343498
[26]   DIFFERENTIAL FORMATION OF RESPONSE SETS BY SPECIFIC DETERMINERS [J].
JONES, PD ;
KAUFMAN, GG .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1975, 35 (04) :821-833
[27]   A METAANALYTIC REVIEW OF ITEM DISCRIMINATION AND DIFFICULTY IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEMS USING NONE-OF-THE-ABOVE [J].
KNOWLES, SL ;
WELCH, CA .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1992, 52 (03) :571-577
[28]   Overcoming students' misconceptions concerning thermal physics with the aid of hints and peer interaction during a lecture course [J].
Leinonen, Risto ;
Asikainen, Mervi A. ;
Hirvonen, Pekka E. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 9 (02)
[29]   Developing A Magnetism Conceptual Survey And Assessing Gender Differences In Student Understanding Of Magnetism [J].
Li, Jing ;
Singh, Chandralekha .
2011 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2012, 1413 :43-46
[30]   Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism [J].
Maloney, DP ;
O'Kuma, TL ;
Hieggelke, CJ ;
Van Heuvelen, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2001, 69 (07) :S12-S23