Examining the effects of testwiseness in conceptual physics evaluations

被引:16
作者
DeVore, Seth [1 ]
Stewart, John [1 ]
Stewart, Gay [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST; ITEM DISCRIMINATION; CORRECT ANSWERS; TEST-WISENESS; POSITION; PRINCIPLES; TESTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020138
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Testwiseness is defined as the set of cognitive strategies used by a student that is intended to improve his or her score on a test regardless of the test's subject matter. Questions with elements that may be affected by testwiseness are common in physics assessments, even in those which have been extensively validated and widely used as evaluation tools in physics education research. The potential effect of several elements of testwiseness were analyzed for questions in the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Conceptual Survey on Electricity and Magnetism that contain distractors that are predicted to be influenced by testwiseness. This analysis was performed using data sets collected between fall 2001 and spring 2014 at one midwestern U.S. university (including over 9500 students) and between Spring 2011 and Spring 2015 at a second eastern U.S. university (including over 2500 students). Student avoidance of "none of the above" or "zero" distractors was statistically significant. The effect of the position of a distractor on its likelihood to be selected was also significant. The effects of several potential positive and negative testwiseness effects on student scores were also examined by developing two modified versions of the FCI designed to include additional elements related to testwiseness; testwiseness produced little effect post-instruction in student performance on the modified instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PHYS TEACHER
[2]  
[Anonymous], DEV VALIDATING MULTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]   Guess where: The position of correct answers in multiple-choice test items as a psychometric variable [J].
Attali, Y ;
Bar-Hillel, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 40 (02) :109-128
[5]   Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning [J].
Bao, Lei ;
Redish, Edward F. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (01)
[6]   Seek whence: Answer sequences and their consequences in key-balanced multiple-choice tests [J].
Bar-Hillel, M ;
Attali, Y .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2002, 56 (04) :299-303
[7]   POSITION BIAS IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS [J].
BLUNCH, NJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1984, 21 (02) :216-220
[8]   POSITION EFFECTS ON INTERVIEW RESPONSES [J].
CARP, FM .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1974, 29 (05) :581-587
[10]   Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results [J].
Crouch, CH ;
Mazur, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2001, 69 (09) :970-977