Cooperative and Delay Minimization Routing Schemes for Dense Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

被引:14
作者
Ullah, Ubaid [1 ]
Khan, Anwar [2 ]
Altowaijri, Saleh M. [3 ]
Ali, Ihsan [4 ]
Rahman, Atiq Ur [3 ]
Kumar, Vijay V. [5 ]
Ali, Munsif [1 ]
Mahmood, Hasan [1 ]
机构
[1] Quaid I Azam Univ, Dept Elect, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
[2] Univ Peshawar, Dept Elect, Pakhtunkhwa 52120, Pakistan
[3] Northern Border Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Rafha 76321, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Syst & Technol, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[5] VIT Univ, Sch Adv Sci, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2019年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
delay minimization; network reliability; delay minimization routing (DMR); cooperative delay minimization routing (CoDMR); underwater WSNs;
D O I
10.3390/sym11020195
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Symmetry in nodes operation in underwater wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is crucial so that nodes consume their energy in a balanced fashion. This prevents rapid death of nodes close to water surface and enhances network life span. Symmetry can be achieved by minimizing delay and ensuring reliable packets delivery to sea surface. It is because delay minimization and reliability are very important in underwater WSNs. Particularly, in dense underworks, packets reliability is of serious concern when a large number of nodes advance packets. The packets collide and are lost. This inefficiently consumes energy and introduces extra delay as the lost packets are usually retransmitted. This is further worsened by adaptation of long routes by packets as the network size grows, as this increases the collision probability of packets. To cope with these issues, two routing schemes are designed for dense underwater WSNs in this paper: delay minimization routing (DMR) and cooperative delay minimization routing (CoDMR). In the DMR scheme, the entire network is divided into four equal regions. The minor sink nodes are placed at center of each region, one in each of the four regions. Unlike the conventional approach, the placement of minor sink nodes in the network involves timer based operation and is independent of the geographical knowledge of the position of every minor sink. All nodes having physical distance from sink lower than the communication range are able to broadcast packets directly to the minor sink nodes, otherwise multi-hopping is used. Placement of the minor sinks in the four regions of the network avoids packets delivery to water surface through long distance multi-hopping, which minimizes delay and balances energy utilization. However, DMR is vulnerable to information reliability due to single path routing. For reliability, CoDMR scheme is designed that adds reliability to DMR using cooperative routing. In CoDMR, a node having physical distance from the sink greater than its communication range, sends the information packets by utilizing cooperation with a single relay node. The destination and the relay nodes are chosen by considering the lowest physical distance with respect to the desired minor sink node. The received packets at the destination node are merged by fixed ratio combining as a diversity technique. The physical distance computation is independent of the geographical knowledge of nodes, unlike the geographical routing protocols. This makes the proposed schemes computationally efficient. Simulation shows that DMR and CoDMR algorithms outperform the counterpart algorithms in terms of total energy cost, energy balancing, packet delivery ratio (PDR), latency, energy left in the battery and nodes depleted of battery power.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Abbasi JS, 2017, INT WIREL COMMUN, P1634, DOI 10.1109/IWCMC.2017.7986529
  • [2] Co-UWSN: Cooperative Energy-Efficient Protocol for Underwater WSNs
    Ahmed, S.
    Javaid, N.
    Khan, F. A.
    Durrani, M. Y.
    Ali, A.
    Shaukat, A.
    Sandhu, M. M.
    Khan, Z. A.
    Qasim, U.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2015,
  • [3] Akyildiz I. F., 2005, Ad Hoc Networks, V3, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004
  • [4] Akyildiz I. F., 2004, ACM SIGBED Rev, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1145/1121776.1121779
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, ACM SIGMOBILE MOBILE
  • [6] CARP: A Channel-aware routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless networks
    Basagni, Stefano
    Petrioli, Chiara
    Petroccia, Roberto
    Spaccini, Daniele
    [J]. AD HOC NETWORKS, 2015, 34 : 92 - 104
  • [7] Surface-Level Path Loss Modeling for Sensor Networks in Flat and Irregular Terrain
    Chong, Poh Kit
    Kim, Daeyoung
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2013, 9 (02)
  • [8] Dubey A, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS AND APPLICATIONS (IOTA), P437, DOI 10.1109/IOTA.2016.7562768
  • [9] Fadoul Moubachir Madani, 2016, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, V91, P304
  • [10] An Energy Efficient Adaptive Cooperative Routing Protocol for Underwater WSNs
    Hafeez, Taimur
    Javaid, Nadeem
    Shakeel, Usman
    Hussain, Muhammad Sheraz
    Maqsood, Hammad
    [J]. 2015 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BROADBAND AND WIRELESS COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND APPLICATIONS (BWCCA 2015), 2015, : 304 - 310