Diagnostic value of ADC in patients with prostate cancer: influence of the choice of b values

被引:65
作者
Thoermer, Gregor [1 ]
Otto, Josephin [1 ]
Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin [1 ]
Seiwerts, Matthias [1 ]
Moche, Michael [1 ]
Garnov, Nikita [1 ]
Franz, Toni [2 ]
Do, Minh [2 ]
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe [2 ]
Horn, Lars-Christian [3 ]
Kahn, Thomas [1 ]
Busse, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pathol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Gleason score; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion; Echo-planar imaging; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENTS; 3; T; MRI; PREDICTION; PERFUSION; GRADE; MAP;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-012-2432-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate the influence of the choice of b values on the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for detection and grading of prostate cancer (PCa). Forty-one patients with biopsy-proven PCa underwent endorectal 3-T MRI before prostatectomy. Different combinations of b values (0-800 s/mm(2)) were used to calculate four representative ADC maps. Mean ADCs of tumours and non-malignant tissue were determined. Tumour appearance on different ADC maps was rated by three radiologists as good, fair or poor by assigning a visual score (VS) of 2, 1 or 0, respectively. Differences in the ADC values with the choice of b values were analysed using one-way ANOVA. Choice of b values had a highly (P < 0.001) significant influence on the absolute ADC in each tissue. Maps using b = [50, 800] and [0, 800] were rated best (VS = 1.6 +/- 0.3) and second best (1.1 +/- 0.3, P < 0.001), respectively. For low-grade carcinomas (Gleason score a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 6, 13/41 patients), only the former choice received scores better than fair (VS = 1.4 +/- 0.3). Mean tumour ADCs showed significant negative correlation (Spearman's rho -0.38 to -0.46, P < 0.05) with Gleason score. Absolute ADC values strongly depend on the choice of b values and therefore should be used with caution for diagnostic purposes. A minimum b value greater than zero is recommended for ADC calculation to improve the visual assessment of PCa in ADC maps. aEuro cent Absolute ADC values are highly dependent on the choice of b values. aEuro cent Absolute ADC thresholds should be used carefully to predict tumour aggressiveness. aEuro cent Subjective ratings of ADC maps involving b = 0 s/mm (2) are poor to fair. aEuro cent Minimum b value greater than 0 s/mm (2) is recommended for ADC calculation.
引用
收藏
页码:1820 / 1828
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Moul, J ;
Carroll, PR ;
Sun, L ;
Lubeck, D ;
Chen, MH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (11) :2163-2172
[2]  
DeLano MC, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1830
[3]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting [J].
Dickinson, Louise ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Carey, Brendan ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. ;
Hoskin, Peter J. ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Persad, Raj ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Sohaib, Aslam S. ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) :477-494
[4]   Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Pickles, MD ;
Turnbull, LW .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) :185-188
[5]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[6]   HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A PERSPECTIVE [J].
GLEASON, DF .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) :273-279
[7]   Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer [J].
Haider, Masoom A. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Tanguay, Jeff ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Hashmi, Ali-Tahir ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (02) :323-328
[8]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[9]   Prostate cancer: Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging - Distinction of true-positive results from chance-detected lesions [J].
Hom, JJ ;
Coakley, FV ;
Simko, JP ;
Qayyum, A ;
Lu, Y ;
Schmitt, L ;
Carroll, PR ;
Kurhanewicz, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) :192-199
[10]   Value of diffusion-weighted Imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil - Preliminary results [J].
Kim, Chan Kyo ;
Park, Byung Kwan ;
Lee, Hyun Moo ;
Kwon, Ghee Young .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (12) :842-847