Synchronization of ovarian stimulation with follicle wave emergence in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a prior suboptimal response: a randomized, controlled trial

被引:12
|
作者
Baerwald, Angela [1 ]
Anderson, Paula [2 ]
Yuzpe, Albert [2 ]
Case, Allison [1 ]
Fluker, Margo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
[2] Genesis Fertil Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Suboptimal response; poor responder; ovarian stimulation; follicle wave; synchronization; NORMAL MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; ESTROUS-CYCLE; HORMONE; DYNAMICS; WOMEN; SUPEROVULATION; OVULATION; EMBRYO; PHASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.051
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the hypothesis that synchronizing initiation of ovarian stimulation with follicle wave emergence would optimize IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in patients with a prior suboptimal response. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Academic and private reproductive endocrinology and infertility centers. Patient(s): Eighty women <= 43 years of age with a history of a suboptimal response. Intervention(s): Initiation of recombinant FSH/GnRH antagonist/recombinant LH/hCG on day 1 (n = 39) or day 4 (n = 41). Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of clinical and biochemical pregnancies, follicles >= 10 and >= 15 mm, oocytes collected, fertilized oocytes, cleavage stage embryos, and blastocysts; serum E-2 concentrations. Outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Result(s): The numbers of follicles that developed to >= 10 and >= 15 mm and serum E-2 were greater when recombinant FSH was initiated on day 1 (5.4, 4.3, 5,827.2 pmol/L) versus day 4 (3.6, 2.5, 4,230.1 pmol/L). The numbers of collected, metaphase II, and fertilized oocytes; cleavage stage embryos; and blastocysts were not different between groups. When we evaluated only those cycles that proceeded to oocyte pick-up, a lower implantation rate (16.1%, 56.0%), biochemical pregnancy rate (PR) (16.1%, 48.0%), and clinical PR (12.9% vs. 36.0%) were detected in the day 1 group versus day 4 group. Conclusion(s): Synchronizing initiation of ovarian stimulation with follicle wave emergence in patients with a prior suboptimal response resulted in an increase in the number of dominant follicles and serum E-2 concentrations; however, improvements in oocyte, embryo, or pregnancy outcomes did not occur. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00439829. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:881-7. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:881 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poorresponder women:: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles
    Barrenetxea, Gorka
    Agirregoikoa, Jon Ander
    Jimenez, Maria Rosario
    de larruzea, Arantza Lopez
    Ganzabal, Teresa
    Carbonero, Koldo
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (03) : 546 - 553
  • [22] The Cycle Characteristics and Outcomes of Infertile Nonclassic 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization
    Jiang, Shutian
    Kuang, Yanping
    HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2019, 51 (05) : 315 - 325
  • [23] Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial
    Nandi, Anupa
    Bhide, Priya
    Hooper, Richard
    Gudi, Anil
    Shah, Amit
    Khan, Khalid
    Homburg, Roy
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (06) : 1329 - +
  • [24] Effectiveness of dehydroepiandrosterone in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ji, Jie
    Ju, Xiaoqian
    Wang, Jiangfeng
    Wu, Haoshu
    Fan, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (11): : 20835 - +
  • [25] Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Dastjerdi, Mozhgan Vahabi
    Ansaripour, Soheila
    Ataei, Mina
    Gharedaghi, Roya
    Hoseini, Seyedeh Melika Mostafavi
    Mohazzab, Arash
    Zafardoust, Simin
    CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [26] Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders : a randomized controlled trial
    Sunol, Jorge
    Castillo, Juan Carlos
    Ortiz, Jose Antonio
    Ten, Jorge
    Fuentes, Ana
    Moliner, Belen
    Martinez, Maria
    Llacer, Joaquin
    Guerrero, Jaime
    Pitas, Ana
    Bernabeu, Andrea
    Bernabeu, Rafael
    F&S REPORTS, 2023, 4 (04): : 344 - 352
  • [27] Ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI: A randomized controlled trial
    Taronger, Roser
    Martinez-Cuenca, Susana
    Ferreros, Inmaculada
    Rubio, Jose M.
    Fernandez-Colom, Pedro J.
    Luisa Martinez-Triguero, M.
    Pellicer, Antonio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 231 : 192 - 197
  • [28] Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cozzolino, Mauro
    Vitagliano, Amerigo
    Cecchino, Gustavo Nardini
    Ambrosini, Guido
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan Antonio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (04) : 722 - 733
  • [29] Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Sunkara, Sesh Kamal
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Faris, Raef
    Braude, Peter
    Khalaf, Yacoub
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (01) : 147 - 153
  • [30] Prednisone vs Placebo and Live Birth in Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Sun, Yun
    Cui, Linlin
    Lu, Yao
    Tan, Jichun
    Dong, Xi
    Ni, Tianxiang
    Yan, Junhao
    Guan, Yichun
    Hao, Guimin
    Liu, Jia-Yin
    Zhang, Bo
    Wei, Daimin
    Hong, Yan
    He, Yaqiong
    Qi, Jia
    Xu, Bing
    Lu, Juanjuan
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Ji, Xiaowei
    Du, Xiaofang
    Zhang, Jie
    Liu, Jinyong
    Wang, Jing
    Huang, Yingqin
    Huang, Dongmei
    Du, Yanzhi
    Vankelecom, Hugo
    Zhang, Heping
    Chen, Zi-jiang
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 329 (17): : 1460 - 1468