Significance of drain fluid amylase check on day 3 after pancreatectomy

被引:6
作者
Lee, Sung Ryol [1 ]
Kim, Hyung Ook [1 ]
Shin, Jun Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Surg, 29 Saemunan Ro, Seoul 03181, South Korea
关键词
drain fluid amylase; pancreatectomy; pancreatic fistula; FISTULA; RISK; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; DEFINITION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PROPOSAL; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1111/ans.15025
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe occurrence of pancreatic fistulae (PF) after pancreatectomy is the main cause of prolonged hospital stay, delayed chemotherapy, poor quality of life and post-operative death. The surgical drainage after pancreatectomy can induce ascending infection, early removal is recommended if the possibility of PF is low. The present study analysed the risk factors and predictors of PF, and confirmed the significance of drain fluid amylase concentration (DFA, U/L) among various factors identified. On the basis of these results, we tried to evaluate the practical clinical applicability of DFA and obtain appropriate baseline values. MethodsFrom January 2014 to December 2017, 117 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, Whipple procedure, subtotal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy. This study retrospectively collected and analysed demographics, pathological results and prognoses of these patients. ResultsMultivariate analysis indicated that the DFA obtained on day 3 after surgery (DFA 3) was the only predictor of PF with statistical significance (P<0.001). Of all the factors tested, area under the curve was highest for DFA 3 (0.89). In addition, of all the factors tested, DFA 3 with a cut-off value of 1004 U/L had the best sensitivity (92%) and specificity (82%). ConclusionsDFA 3 of a cut-off value of 1004 U/L might be determined to be the best predictor of PF, and early removal of the surgical drain could be considered if DFA (1004 U/L) is lower than the cut-off value at 3days after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 502
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The Gray Zone Between Postpancreaticoduodenectomy Collections and Pancreatic Fistula [J].
Barreto, George ;
Souza, Melroy A. D. ;
Shukla, Parul J. ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. .
PANCREAS, 2008, 37 (04) :422-425
[2]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[3]   The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Sarr, Micheal ;
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Allen, Peter ;
Andersson, Roland ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Conlon, Kevin ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Falconi, Massimo ;
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;
Fingerhut, Abe ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Izbicki, Jakob ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. ;
Olah, Attila ;
Schulick, Richard ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Takaori, Kyoichi ;
Traverso, William ;
Vollmer, Charles ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Buehler, Marcus .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591
[4]   Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Molinari, Enrico ;
Malleo, Giuseppe ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
Butturini, Giovanni ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Talamini, Giorgio ;
Pederzoli, Paolo .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) :207-214
[5]   Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Chen, Ji-Ye ;
Feng, Jian ;
Wang, Xian-Qiang ;
Cai, Shou-Wang ;
Dong, Jia-Hong ;
Chen, Yong-Liang .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (19) :5926-5933
[6]   Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery - A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
DeOliveira, Michelle L. ;
Winter, Jordan M. ;
Schafer, Markus ;
Cunningham, Steven C. ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (06) :931-939
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Analysis of Pancreatic Fistula According to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Classification Scheme for 294 Patients Who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Single Center [J].
Dong, Xin ;
Zhang, Bo ;
Kang, Mu Xing ;
Chen, Ying ;
Guo, Qing Qu ;
Wu, Yu Lian .
PANCREAS, 2011, 40 (02) :222-228
[9]   Pancreatic Anastomotic Leakage after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, Clinical predictors, and Management (Single Center Experience) [J].
El Nakeeb, Ayman ;
Salah, Tarek ;
Sultan, Ahmad ;
El Hemaly, Mohamed ;
Askr, Waleed ;
Ezzat, Helmy ;
Hamdy, Emad ;
Atef, Ehab ;
El Hanafy, Ehab ;
El-Geidie, Ahmed ;
Wahab, Mohamed Abdel ;
Abdallah, Talaat .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) :1405-1418
[10]   Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy [J].
Fahy, BN ;
Frey, CF ;
Ho, HS ;
Beckett, L ;
Bold, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 183 (03) :237-241