Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach

被引:5
|
作者
Jhaveri, Chetan A. [1 ]
Nenavani, Jitendra M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nirma Univ, Inst Management, Operat Management & Quantitat Tech Area, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[2] Nirma Univ, Inst Management, Sarkhej Gandhinagar Highway, Ahmadabad 382481, Gujarat, India
关键词
Analytical Hierarchy Process; e-tailing; eTail Service Quality; Customer Preferences; Decision-making; Confirmatory Factor Analysis; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; E-COMMERCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SECURITY CONCERNS; PRIVACY CONCERNS; ONLINE PRIVACY; E-LOYALTY; SATISFACTION; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1177/0972262919898093
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research study is to create comparative evaluation model to compare eTail firms across several eTail service quality dimensions. This research paper employs Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for analysing decision problem into several stages which include objective, criteria and the alternatives to evaluate eTail service organizations. Non-probabilistic method of sampling was used to collect the responses. This study validated the formal e-Tailing quality scale eTailQ, with an alteration which resulted into its suitability in the Indian context. After validating the scale, four variables were taken for pair-wise comparison, namely website design, fulfilment/ reliability, security/ privacy and customer services. Results of this study imparts a better understanding of consumer preferences among different eTail service quality dimensions. This research would be helpful to practitioners in eTail industry to measure the quality of their services in comparison to their competitors. Since many eTail organizations have attained scale and volumes but are struggling to reach at sustainable stage, this research may be helpful to bring those organizations at sustainability by knowing which factor should be given more focus. The analysis of best alternative with given criteria by deploying AHP technique is first-ever done on e-Tail scale in India.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 319
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new approach on the quality evaluation of tourist services
    Butnaru, Gina Ionela
    Miller, Amanda
    Nita, Valentin
    Stefanica, Mirela
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2018, 31 (01): : 1418 - 1436
  • [2] Evaluation of Quality of Personalised Learning Scenarios: An Improved MCEQLS AHP Method
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Zilinskiene, Inga
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 28 (06) : 1309 - 1315
  • [3] An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS for E-commerce Evaluation
    Tran Thi Tham
    Hong-Phuc Nguyen
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 20 (02): : 82 - 95
  • [4] An AHP-based approach toward enterprise architecture analysis based on enterprise architecture quality attributes
    Razavi, Mahsa
    Aliee, Fereidoon Shams
    Badie, Kambiz
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 28 (02) : 449 - 472
  • [5] Identifying key factors affecting consumers' choice of wealth management services: an AHP approach
    Yu, Vincent F.
    Ting, Hsiu-I
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (06) : 929 - 939
  • [6] A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP
    Karapetrovic, S
    Rosenbloom, ES
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (03) : 704 - 718
  • [7] AHP Model for Quality Evaluation of Healthcare System
    Kriksciuniene, Dalia
    Sakalauskas, Virgilijus
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (ICIST 2017), 2017, 756 : 129 - 141
  • [8] The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trustin online loyalty development process
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Jin, Byoungho
    Swinney, Jane L.
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2009, 16 (04) : 239 - 247
  • [9] Grindability evaluation of advanced ceramics with AHP approach
    Wang, M
    Yu, AB
    Zhang, Y
    ADVANCES IN GRINDING AND ABRASIVE TECHNOLOGY XIII, 2006, 304-305 : 222 - 226
  • [10] Learning Object Repositories Evaluation based on Quality Indicators using AHP Method
    da Silva, Rosymeire Oliveira
    Fiorese, Adriano
    2020 XLVI LATIN AMERICAN COMPUTING CONFERENCE (CLEI 2020), 2021, : 48 - 55