Foam sclerotherapy compared with liquid sclerotherapy for the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Bi, Minglei [1 ]
Li, Danyi [1 ]
Chen, Zhenyu [1 ]
Wang, Yanjin [1 ]
Ren, Jizhen [1 ]
Zhang, Weina [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Jiangsu 16 Rd, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
lower extremity; meta-analysis; sclerotherapy; varicose veins; CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY; GREAT SAPHENOUS-VEIN; POLIDOCANOL FOAM; EFFICACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DISEASE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000020332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a continued discussion on which is the best sclerosant to treat lower extremity varicose veins. Therefore, we did this meta-analysis to determine that foam sclerotherapy versus liquid sclerotherapy, which could perform better in the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins. Materials and methods: We independently searched 5 databases from inception to February 1, 2019, for randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials for comparing foam sclerotherapy and liquid sclerotherapy for the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of studies. The primary outcome and secondary outcomes were analyzed using stata 15.0. This meta-analysis was performed according to Cochrane Handbook. Results: There were significant differences in effective rate (P < .001, odd ratios = 5.64, 95% confidence interval = 3.93-8.10) and incidence rate of pain (P = .030, odd ratios = 1.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-2.21) between foam sclerotherapy and liquid sclerotherapy. And there were no significant differences among local inflammation (P = .896, rate difference = 0.00, 95% confidence interval = -0.03 to 0.03), thrombophlebitis (P = .90, rate difference = 0.00, 95% confidence interval = -0.02 to 0.02) and hyperpigmentation (P = .336, rate difference = 0.05, 95% confidence interval = -0.05 to 0.14). Conclusions: Although foam sclerotherapy has a higher incidence rate of complications, it could achieve a more stable clinical efficacy in the treatment of lower extremity varicose veins than liquid sclerotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liquid and Foam Sclerotherapy for Spider and Varicose Veins
    Gibson, Kathleen
    Gunderson, Krissa
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 98 (02) : 415 - +
  • [2] Effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins
    Nael, Raha
    Rathbun, Suman
    VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2010, 15 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [3] Overview on foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins
    Urbanek, Tomasz
    PHLEBOLYMPHOLOGY, 2024, 31 (02)
  • [4] Comparison of Foam and Liquid Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Varicose Veins and Telangiectasia in Obese Patients
    Kanber, Eyup Murat
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [5] Foam and liquid sclerotherapy for varicose veins
    Smith, P. Coleridge
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2009, 24 : 62 - 72
  • [6] Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy, an alternative to ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose vein treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lim, Sheng Y.
    Tan, Joshua X. D.
    D'Cruz, Reuban T.
    Syn, Nicholas
    Chong, Tze T.
    Tang, Tjun Y.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2020, 35 (06) : 369 - 383
  • [7] Foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins
    Bergan, John
    Cheng, Van
    VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (05) : 269 - 272
  • [8] Evidence of Foam Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Varicose Veins
    Peter, Jochen
    Pourhassan, Siamak
    PHLEBOLOGIE, 2019, 48 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [9] Visual disturbance following sclerotherapy for varicose veins, reticular veins and telangiectasias: a systematic literature review
    Willenberg, T.
    Smith, P. C.
    Shepherd, A.
    Davies, A. H.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2013, 28 (03) : 123 - 131
  • [10] Treatment of varicose veins by foam sclerotherapy: Two clinical series
    Cavezzi, A
    Frullini, A
    Ricci, S
    Tessari, L
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2002, 17 (01) : 13 - 18