Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: Theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China

被引:53
作者
Zang, Liangzhen [1 ,2 ]
Araral, Eduardo [3 ]
Wang, Yahua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, China Inst Rural Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
China; Commons; Irrigation; Land fragmentation; Collective action; Ostrom; IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; OWNERSHIP; MARKET; TENURE; ORGANIZATIONS; DETERMINANTS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The extant literature on the commons describes a large number of factors that could explain the drama of the commons or why some commons are managed well but others are not. However, little is known about the effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons. This question is important for developing countries, especially China where land holdings are highly fragmented with farmers having on average 4.127 plots of land. We employ ordered probit and step wise regression based on data from a survey of 3895 households from 284 villages in 17 provinces or regions in China. We find, consistent with theoretical expectation, that land fragmentation has a negative and significant effect on collective action and the governance of the commons. Farmers with more plots of land are more likely to free ride and less likely to contribute to collective action. Our findings have important implications for the governance of the commons specially in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Yadama, GN .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1997, 28 (03) :435-465
[2]  
Agrawal A, 2005, WORLD DEV, V27, P629
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, RULES GAMES COMMON P
[4]  
Araral E. K. Jr., 2011, Water Alternatives, V4, P110
[5]   The Strategic Games that Donors and Bureaucrats Play: An Institutional Rational Choice Analysis [J].
Araral, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2009, 19 (04) :853-871
[6]   What Explains Collective Action in the Commons? Theory and Evidence from the Philippines [J].
Araral, Eduardo, Jr. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 37 (03) :687-697
[7]  
Cai Q., 2017, J NANJING AGR U SOC, V17, P108
[8]  
Cai QH., 2016, J. Public Manag, V13, P89, DOI DOI 10.16149/J.CNKI.23-1523.2016.04.008
[9]  
Cai R., 2014, Economic Review, V1, P48, DOI [https://doi.org/10.19361/j.er.2014.01.005, DOI 10.19361/J.ER.2014.01.005]
[10]  
[蔡荣 Cai Rong], 2013, [资源科学, Resources Science], V35, P1661