Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients

被引:108
作者
van Casteren, N. J. [1 ]
van Santbrink, E. J. P. [2 ]
van Inzen, W. [2 ]
Romijn, J. C. [1 ]
Dohle, G. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Androl Div, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Semen cryopreservation; assisted reproduction techniques; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.055
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the use rate and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcome of the cryopreserved semen of cancer patients with an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 2-23 years). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: University-affiliated andrology and reproduction center. Patient(s): Six hundred twenty-nine male cancer patients who were referred for semen cryopreservation between 1983 and 2004. Intervention(s): Review of patient characteristics and ART outcome. Main Outcome Measure(s): Use rite and live births using cryopreserved semen. Result(s): A total of 749 semen samples from 557 men were preserved. Ninety-one patients died during follow-up, and another 29 requested disposal. Forty-two patients requested the use of their banked semen. ART data were available for 37 patients. A total of 101 ART cycles (32 IVF, 53 intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSIs], nine cryo-ET, and seven intrauterine inseminations [IUIs]) were performed, resulting in, respectively, 8, 16, 2, and I pregnancies. Pregnancies rates for IVF and ICSI were significantly higher than those for IUI. Conclusion(S): So far, 7.5% of the cancer survivors have used their banked semen, which led to live births in 49% of the couples. Semen cryopreservation is a reliable method to preserve fertility potential and gives couples a reasonable chance of achieving parenthood. (Fertil Steril (R) 2008;90:2245-50. (C) 2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2245 / 2250
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   EFFECT OF CRYOPRESERVATION ON SEMEN QUALITY IN PATIENTS WITH TESTICULAR CANCER [J].
AGARWAL, A ;
TOLENTINO, MV ;
SIDHU, RS ;
AYZMAN, I ;
LEE, JC ;
THOMAS, AJ ;
SHEKARRIZ, M .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) :382-389
[2]   Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens [J].
Agarwal, A ;
Ranganathan, P ;
Kattal, N ;
Pasqualotto, F ;
Hallak, J ;
Khayal, S ;
Mascha, E .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (02) :342-348
[3]  
Allen C, 2003, Ir Med J, V96, P23
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction
[5]   Fertilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa [J].
Borges, Edson, Jr. ;
Rossi, Lia Mara ;
de Freitas, Christiany Victor Locambo ;
Guilherme, Patricia ;
Bonetti, Tatiana Carvalho S. ;
Iaconelli, Assumpto ;
Pasqualotto, Fabio Firmbach .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (02) :316-320
[6]   FERTILIZING CAPACITY OF FROZEN HUMAN SPERMATOZOA [J].
BUNGE, RG ;
SHERMAN, JK .
NATURE, 1953, 172 (4382) :767-768
[7]   Sperm cryopreservation for male patients with cancer: an epidemiological analysis at the University of Pennsylvania [J].
Chung, K ;
Irani, J ;
Knee, G ;
Efymow, B ;
Blasco, L ;
Patrizio, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 113 :S7-S11
[8]  
DAVIS OK, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V53, P377
[9]   Why cancer patients request disposal of cryopreserved semen specimens posttherapy: a retrospective study [J].
Hallak, J ;
Sharma, RK ;
Thomas, AJ ;
Agarwal, A .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (05) :889-893
[10]   Poor semen quality from patients with malignancies does not rule out sperm banking [J].
Hallak, J ;
Mahran, A ;
Chae, J ;
Agarwal, A .
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (04) :281-284