Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients

被引:107
作者
van Casteren, N. J. [1 ]
van Santbrink, E. J. P. [2 ]
van Inzen, W. [2 ]
Romijn, J. C. [1 ]
Dohle, G. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Androl Div, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Semen cryopreservation; assisted reproduction techniques; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.055
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the use rate and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcome of the cryopreserved semen of cancer patients with an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 2-23 years). Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: University-affiliated andrology and reproduction center. Patient(s): Six hundred twenty-nine male cancer patients who were referred for semen cryopreservation between 1983 and 2004. Intervention(s): Review of patient characteristics and ART outcome. Main Outcome Measure(s): Use rite and live births using cryopreserved semen. Result(s): A total of 749 semen samples from 557 men were preserved. Ninety-one patients died during follow-up, and another 29 requested disposal. Forty-two patients requested the use of their banked semen. ART data were available for 37 patients. A total of 101 ART cycles (32 IVF, 53 intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSIs], nine cryo-ET, and seven intrauterine inseminations [IUIs]) were performed, resulting in, respectively, 8, 16, 2, and I pregnancies. Pregnancies rates for IVF and ICSI were significantly higher than those for IUI. Conclusion(S): So far, 7.5% of the cancer survivors have used their banked semen, which led to live births in 49% of the couples. Semen cryopreservation is a reliable method to preserve fertility potential and gives couples a reasonable chance of achieving parenthood. (Fertil Steril (R) 2008;90:2245-50. (C) 2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2245 / 2250
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF CRYOPRESERVATION ON SEMEN QUALITY IN PATIENTS WITH TESTICULAR CANCER
    AGARWAL, A
    TOLENTINO, MV
    SIDHU, RS
    AYZMAN, I
    LEE, JC
    THOMAS, AJ
    SHEKARRIZ, M
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) : 382 - 389
  • [2] Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens
    Agarwal, A
    Ranganathan, P
    Kattal, N
    Pasqualotto, F
    Hallak, J
    Khayal, S
    Mascha, E
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (02) : 342 - 348
  • [3] Allen C, 2003, Ir Med J, V96, P23
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction
  • [5] Fertilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa
    Borges, Edson, Jr.
    Rossi, Lia Mara
    de Freitas, Christiany Victor Locambo
    Guilherme, Patricia
    Bonetti, Tatiana Carvalho S.
    Iaconelli, Assumpto
    Pasqualotto, Fabio Firmbach
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (02) : 316 - 320
  • [6] FERTILIZING CAPACITY OF FROZEN HUMAN SPERMATOZOA
    BUNGE, RG
    SHERMAN, JK
    [J]. NATURE, 1953, 172 (4382) : 767 - 768
  • [7] Sperm cryopreservation for male patients with cancer: an epidemiological analysis at the University of Pennsylvania
    Chung, K
    Irani, J
    Knee, G
    Efymow, B
    Blasco, L
    Patrizio, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 113 : S7 - S11
  • [8] DAVIS OK, 1990, FERTIL STERIL, V53, P377
  • [9] Why cancer patients request disposal of cryopreserved semen specimens posttherapy: a retrospective study
    Hallak, J
    Sharma, RK
    Thomas, AJ
    Agarwal, A
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (05) : 889 - 893
  • [10] Poor semen quality from patients with malignancies does not rule out sperm banking
    Hallak, J
    Mahran, A
    Chae, J
    Agarwal, A
    [J]. UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (04): : 281 - 284