Radiation therapy morbidity in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Dosimetric and clinical correlation

被引:145
作者
Perez, CA [1 ]
Girgsby, PW [1 ]
Lockett, MA [1 ]
Chao, KSC [1 ]
Williamson, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Radiat Oncol Ctr, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词
carcinoma of the uterine cervix; irradiation; morbidity;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00111-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantitate the impact of total doses of irradiation, dose rate, and ratio of doses to bladder or rectum and point A on sequelae in patients treated with irradiation alone for cervical cancer. Methods and Materials: Records were reviewed of 1456 patients (Stages IB-IVA) treated with external-beam irradiation plus two low dose rate intracavitary insertions to deliver 70 to 90 Gy to point A. Follow-up was obtained in 98% of patients (median, 11 years; minimum, 3 years; maximum, 30 years). The relationships among various dosimetry parameters and Grade 2 or 3 sequelae were analyzed. Results: In Stage IB, the frequency of patients developing Grade 2 morbidity was 9%, and Grade 3 morbidity, 5%; in Stages IIA, IIB, III, and IVA, Grade 2 morbidity was 10% to 12% and Grade 3 was 10%. The most frequent Grade 2 sequelae were cystitis and proctitis (0.7% to 3%). The most common Grade 3 sequelae were vesicovaginal fistula (0.6% to 2% in patients with Stage I-III tumors), rectovaginal fistula (0.8% to to 3%), and intestinal obstruction (0.8% to 4%). In the bladder, doses below 80 Gy correlated with less than 3% incidence of morbidity and 5% with higher doses (p = 0.31). In the rectosigmoid, the incidence of significant morbidity was less than 4% with doses below 75 Gy and increased to 9% with higher doses. For the small intestine, the incidence of morbidity was less than 1% with 50 Gy or less, 2% with 50 to 60 Gy, and 5% with higher doses to the lateral pelvic wall (p = 0.04). When the ratio of dose to the bladder or rectum in relation to point A was 0.8 or less, the incidence of rectal morbidity was 2.5% (8 of 320) vs. 7.3% (80 of 1095) with higher ratios (p less than or equal to 0.01); bladder morbidity was 2.3% (7 of 305) and 5.8% (64 of 1110), respectively (p = 0.02). The incidence of Grade 2 and 3 bladder morbidity was 2.9% (10 of 336) when the dose rate was less than 0.80 Gy/h, in contrast to 6.1% (62 of 1010) with higher dose rates (p = 0.07). Rectal morbidity was 2% to 5% in Stage LB, regardless of dose rate to the rectum; in Stages IIA-B and III, morbidity was 5.2% (28 of 539) with a dose rate of 0.80 Gy or less and 10.7% (37 of 347) with higher dose rates (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that dose to the rectal point was the only factor influencing rectosigmoid sequelae, and dose to the bladder point affected bladder morbidity. Conclusions: Various dosimetric parameters correlate closely with the incidence of significant morbidity in patients treated with definitive irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Careful dosimetry and special attention to related factors will reduce morbidity to the lowest possible level without compromising pelvic tumor control. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1980, TXB RADIOTHERAPY
  • [2] MAXIMUM AND MEAN BLADDER DOSE DEFINED FROM ULTRASONOGRAPHY - COMPARISON WITH THE ICRU REFERENCE IN GYNECOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY
    BARILLOT, I
    HORIOT, JC
    MAINGON, P
    BONELEPINOY, MC
    VAILLANT, D
    FEUTRAY, S
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 30 (03) : 231 - 238
  • [3] RELATIONSHIP OF NSD TO REACTIONS AND COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING TREATMENT FOR MALIGNANT UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS
    BUCHLER, DA
    KLINE, JC
    PECKHAM, BM
    ELLIS, F
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1974, 110 (03) : 687 - 690
  • [4] A GLOSSARY FOR REPORTING COMPLICATIONS OF TREATMENT IN GYNECOLOGICAL CANCERS
    CHASSAGNE, D
    SISMONDI, P
    HORIOT, JC
    SINISTRERO, G
    BEY, P
    ZOLA, P
    PERNOT, M
    GERBAULET, A
    KUNKLER, I
    MICHEL, G
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 26 (03) : 195 - 202
  • [5] CHAU PM, 1962, AMER J ROENTGENOL RA, V87, P22
  • [6] CARCINOMA OF CERVIX - TIME DOSE ANALYSIS OF CONTROL AND COMPLICATIONS
    CHISM, SE
    KEYS, HM
    GILLIN, MT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1975, 123 (01) : 84 - 90
  • [7] A CT BASED DOSIMETRY SYSTEM FOR INTRACAVITARY THERAPY IN CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    COLTART, RS
    NETHERSELL, ABW
    THOMAS, S
    DIXON, AK
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1987, 10 (04) : 295 - 305
  • [8] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [9] DOSE-VOLUME ANALYSIS AND THE PREVENTION OF RADIATION SEQUELAE IN CERVICAL-CANCER
    CROOK, JM
    ESCHE, BA
    CHAPLAIN, G
    ISTURIZ, J
    SENTENAC, I
    HORIOT, JC
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1987, 8 (04) : 321 - 332
  • [10] ROUTINE CLINICAL ESTIMATION OF RECTAL, RECTOSIGMOIDAL, AND BLADDER DOSES FROM INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    CUNNINGHAM, DE
    STRYKER, JA
    VELKLEY, DE
    CHUNG, CK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1981, 7 (05): : 653 - 660