Application of 11C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

被引:70
作者
Mohsen, Beheshti [1 ]
Giorgio, Treglia [2 ,3 ]
Rasoul, Zakavi Seyed [4 ]
Werner, Langsteger [1 ]
Ali, Ghodsi Rad Mohammad [4 ]
Reza, Dabbagh Kakhki Vahid [4 ]
Ramin, Sadeghi [4 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp Nucl Med & Endocrinol, PET CT Ctr LINZ, Linz, Austria
[2] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, Dept Nucl Med, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[3] Oncol Inst So Switzerland, PET CT Ctr, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Nucl Med Res Ctr, Mashhad 9176699199, Iran
关键词
prostate cancer; C-11-acetate; PET; systematic review; meta-analysis; C-11-ACETATE PET; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENT DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST; FDG PET; MRI; PSA; 18F-FLUOROCHOLINE; LOCALIZATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12279
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To review the literature on the application of C-11-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer. We systematically reviewed the available literature and presented the results in meta-analysis format. PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI web of knowledge, Science Direct, Springer, and Google Scholar were searched with Acetate AND PET AND Prostate' as keywords. All studies that evaluated accuracy of C-11-acetate imaging in primary or recurrent prostate cancer were included, if enough data could be extracted for calculation of sensitivity and/or specificity. In all, 23 studies were included in the study. For evaluation of primary tumour, pooled sensitivity was 75.1 (69.8-79.8)% and specificity was 75.8 (72.4-78.9)%. For detection of recurrence, sensitivity was 64 (59-69)% and specificity was 93 (83-98)%. Sensitivity for recurrence detection was higher in post-surgical vs post-radiotherapy patients and in patients with PSA at relapse of >1ng/mL. Studies using PET/computed tomography vs PET also showed higher sensitivity for detection of recurrence. Imaging with C-11-acetate PET can be useful in patients with prostate cancer. This is especially true for evaluation of patients at PSA relapse, although the sensitivity is overall low. For primary tumour evaluation (localisation of tumour in the prostate and differentiation of malignant from benign lesions), C-11-acetate is of limited value due to low sensitivity and specificity. Due to the poor quality of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution and further high-quality studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1072
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Alavi S., 2003, European Urology Supplements, V2, P22, DOI 10.1016/S1569-9056(03)80087-8
[2]   11C-acetate PET in the early evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence [J].
Albrecht, Susanne ;
Buchegger, Franz ;
Soloviev, Dmitri ;
Zaidi, Habib ;
Vees, Hansjoerg ;
Khan, Haleem G. ;
Keller, Alain ;
Delaloye, Angelika Bischof ;
Ratib, Osman ;
Miralbell, Raymond .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (02) :185-196
[3]   THE EFFICACY OF 11 CARBON ACETATE PET SCAN IN THE STAGING AND MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Arenas, Javier L. ;
Canby-Hagino, Edith .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) :781-781
[4]   A Systematic Review of the Role of Imaging before Salvage Radiotherapy for Post-prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Beresford, M. J. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Benson, R. J. ;
Ajithkumar, T. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (01) :46-55
[5]  
Buchegger F, 2012, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V39, pS396
[6]   Non-FDG PET in the practice of oncology [J].
Caroli, P. ;
Nanni, C. ;
Rubello, D. ;
Alavi, A. ;
Fanti, S. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 47 (02) :120-125
[7]  
de Jong IJ, 2003, THESIS GRONINGEN U N
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13
[10]  
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P556