A decision-making support system module for project manager selection according to past performance

被引:35
作者
Hadad, Yossi [1 ]
Keren, Baruch [1 ]
Laslo, Zohar [1 ]
机构
[1] SCE Shamoon Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Project management (PM); Ranking methods (RM); Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U test (MWW); DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ACTIVITY TIME; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a decision-making support system (DMSS) module for selecting project managers and demonstrates its implementation. The selection of a new project manager is based mainly on the past performance of potential managers, for example, on the relative performance evaluations they have received on projects managed by them in the past. Past projects are ranked in accordance with a ranking method. Project managers are ordered according to past project rank. The difference in quality between the past performance of the candidates is statistically examined using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U test. This enables the establishment of a subgroup of one or more preferred candidates, where the significance level of the statistical test has an impact on the subgroup size. The final candidate may be selected from this subgroup according to personal qualifications and suitability for the specific project. We demonstrated the use of such a DMSS module by an Israeli information technology company as part of their process to select a project manager. A ranking method within the Data Envelopment Analysis context (the Cross-Efficient method) was implemented with three inputs and four outputs selected for the project ranking. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 541
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context [J].
Adler, N ;
Friedman, L ;
Sinuany-Stern, Z .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (02) :249-265
[2]   Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach [J].
Asosheh, Abbas ;
Nalchigar, Soroosh ;
Jamporazmey, Mona .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (08) :5931-5938
[3]  
Ballsteros-Perez P., 2012, INT J PROJECT MANAGE
[4]   Supporting risks in software project management [J].
Barros, MD ;
Werner, CML ;
Travassos, GH .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2004, 70 (1-2) :21-35
[5]   A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Hoffman, James J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (02) :155-164
[6]  
Chan VKY, 2007, APPLIED COMPUTING 2007, VOL 1 AND 2, P1484, DOI 10.1145/1244002.1244319
[7]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[8]  
Conway G.R., 1989, AGR ADM, V20, P31
[9]  
Eilat H., 2006, OMEGA, V36, P895
[10]   Utilizing data envelopment analysis to benchmark safety performance of construction contractors [J].
El-Mashaleh, Mohammad S. ;
Rababeh, Shaher M. ;
Hyari, Khalied H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (01) :61-67