Short-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA

被引:63
|
作者
Wind, Michael A., Jr. [1 ]
Swank, Michael L. [2 ]
Sorger, Joel I. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] OrthoVirginia, Richmond, VA 23235 USA
[2] Cincinnati Orthopaed Res Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Wellington Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Pediat Orthopaed, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; STOCK DEFICIENCY; RECONSTRUCTION; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; PROSTHESIS; MANAGEMENT; ALLOGRAFT; CEMENT;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20130222-11
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Managing severe periacetabular bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging task. Multiple treatment options have been described. A custom triflanged acetabular component is a recent treatment option. The authors retrospectively reviewed 19 hips in 19 patients with massive periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky types 3A/3B and AAOS types III/IV) treated with custom triflanged acetabular components. Mean patient age at surgery was 58 years (range, 42-79 years). At an average follow-up of 31 months (range, 16-59 months), mean Harris Hip Score had improved from 38 preoperatively to 63 postoperatively, and mean Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index scores had improved from 43 preoperatively to 26 postoperatively. Sixty-five percent of cases were considered successful. Three (16%) patients had significant complications; 2 (11%) custom triflanged acetabular components were removed due to failure. At last follow-up, 6 (43%) of 14 patients reported that their ambulatory status was improved vs their preoperative status, 3 (21%) reported no change, and 5 (36%) reported that their ambulatory status was worse than their preoperative status. In this study, the use of a custom triflanged acetabular component for massive periacetabular bone loss in revision THA had less favorable results than in other reports. Use of a custom triflanged acetabular component for massive periacetabular bone loss in revision THA remains a viable option, but surgeon and patient expectations should be realistic.
引用
收藏
页码:E260 / E265
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Management Principles of Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Review of the Literature
    Driesman, Adam S.
    Konopka, Jaclyn A.
    Feder, Oren
    Aggarwal, Vinay
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2023, 81 (01): : 4 - 10
  • [42] Acetabular reconstruction using morcellised bone with ring support - Medium term results at three to nine years
    Krishnan, Kamalakannan Murali
    Longstaff, Lee
    Partington, Paul
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2011, 77 (01): : 61 - 67
  • [43] Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity MID-TERM RESULTS OF A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 35 CASESd
    Hipfl, C.
    Janz, V
    Loechel, J.
    Perka, C.
    Wassilew, G., I
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (11) : 1442 - 1448
  • [44] Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity
    Froeschen, Frank S.
    Randau, Thomas M.
    Gravius, Nadine
    Wirtz, Dieter C.
    Gravius, Sascha
    Walter, Sebastian G.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (03) : 703 - 711
  • [45] Acetabular revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component COMPARISON OF THE KAPLAN-MEIER ANALYSIS TO THE COMPETING RISK ANALYSIS IN 62 REVISIONS WITH 25 TO 30 YEARS FOLLOW-UP
    te Stroet, M. A. J.
    Keurentjes, J. C.
    Rijnen, W. H. C.
    Gardeniers, J. W. M.
    Verdonschot, N.
    Slooff, T. J. J. H.
    Schreurs, B. W.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (10) : 1338 - 1344
  • [46] Downsizing and minimising medialisation of the acetabular component: Novel technique to preserve bone in THA
    Raj, Jeffrey J.
    Thompson, Matt
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Jaiprakash, Anjali
    Varughese, Ibin
    Crawford, Ross W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 237 (03) : 368 - 374
  • [47] Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips
    Scharff-Baauw, Marieke
    Van Hooff, Miranda L.
    Van Hellemondt, Gijs G.
    Jutte, Paul C.
    Bulstra, Sjoerd K.
    Spruit, Maarten
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2021, 92 (03) : 297 - 303
  • [48] Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review
    Jain, Sameer
    Grogan, Richard J.
    Giannoudis, Peter V.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (02) : 109 - 122
  • [49] Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
    Hsu, Chen-Heng
    Hu, Chih-Chien
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Chang, Yu-Han
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Chen, Chun-Chieh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [50] Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?
    Lieberman, Elizabeth
    Sasala, Lee
    Thornton, Tanner
    Barrack, Robert
    Nunley, Ryan
    Thapa, Susan
    Clohisy, John
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23