Quality assessment of diabetes online patient education materials from academic institutions

被引:4
作者
Dorcely, Brenda [1 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [2 ]
Raghuwanshi, Maya [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Med, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Diabetes; health literacy; online education materials; readability; USA; READABILITY ASSESSMENT; OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD; AMERICAN ACADEMY; SURGERY; FORMULA; ASSOCIATION; INFORMATION; WEBSITES;
D O I
10.1177/0017896914552203
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the readability of type 2 diabetes online patient education materials from academic institutions in the northeast USA and the American Diabetes Association. Many US residents utilise the Internet to obtain health information. Studies have shown that online patient education materials are often written above the recommended fifth grade reading level, and this may pertain to diabetes health information as well. As diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the USA and glycaemic control is related to health literacy, the readability of diabetic health information is pertinent. Methods: Many academic institutions provide type 2 diabetes online health information. A readability analysis was conducted of materials on the websites of academic institutions or affiliate hospitals with endocrinology fellowships in the northeast USA, and from the American Diabetes Association, using 10 quantitative scales: the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, the New Dale-Chall Test, the Coleman-Liau Index, the New Fog Count, the Raygor Readability Estimate, the FORCAST test and the Fry Graph. Results: On average, northeast US academic institutions prepared their online diabetes patient education materials at above a 10th grade reading level. Conclusion: The readability of type 2 diabetes patient health information from academic websites is too difficult. It may benefit people with diabetes for future patient education materials to be prepared at lower reading grade levels.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 577
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Adkins A.D., 2001, J CHILD FAM STUD, V10, P279, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1012563808389
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, METHODOLOGIES DETERM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH LITERACY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, HLTH FACT SHEET
[5]  
Chall J. S., 1995, Manual for use of the new Dale-Chall readability formula
[6]   Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery [J].
Cherla, Deepa V. ;
Sanghvi, Saurin ;
Choudhry, Osamah J. ;
Liu, James K. ;
Eloy, Jean Anderson .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (08) :1649-1654
[7]   Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials [J].
Colaco, Marc ;
Svider, Peter F. ;
Agarwal, Nitin ;
Eloy, Jean Anderson ;
Jackson, Imani M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03) :1048-1052
[8]   COMPUTER READABILITY FORMULA DESIGNED FOR MACHINE SCORING [J].
COLEMAN, M ;
LIAU, TL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 60 (02) :283-284
[9]  
Doak C.H., 1996, Teaching patients with low literacy skills
[10]  
Electronic Residency Application Service-Association of American Medical Colleges, 2014, END DIAB MET INT MED