Analytical results for operational flash flood guidance

被引:138
作者
Georgakakos, KP [1 ]
机构
[1] Hydrol Res Ctr, San Diego, CA 92130 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
flash floods; hydrologic modeling; real-time prediction; model uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The theoretical basis of developing operational flash flood guidance systems is studied using analytical methods. The Sacramento soil moisture accounting model is used operationally in the United States to produce flash flood guidance estimates of a given duration from threshold runoff estimates. Analytical results to (a) shed light on the properties of this model's short-term surface runoff predictions under substantial rainfall forcing and (b) to facilitate flash flood computations in real time. The results derived pertain to the computation of pervious-area surface runoff from the upper zone tension and free water elements of the model, and to surface runoff from both the permanently impervious and the variable additional impervious area of the model that provides spatially distributed characteristics in the production of surface runoff. The time to the production of surface runoff is also computed on the basis of the model parameters and initial water element conditions and is related to the flash flood guidance duration. Analytical solutions for time to saturation and surface runoff are also derived for the case of saturation-excess models, and these results are compared to those derived for the Sacramento model. Various characteristics of the flash flood guidance to threshold runoff relationship are discussed and considerations for real-time application are offered. Uncertainty analysis of the threshold runoff to flash flood guidance transformation is also performed. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 103
页数:23
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Burnash R. J. C., 1973, GEN STREAMFLOW SIMUL
  • [2] National threshold runoff estimation utilizing GIS in support of operational flash flood warning systems
    Carpenter, TM
    Sperfslage, JA
    Georgakakos, KP
    Sweeney, T
    Fread, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 224 (1-2) : 21 - 44
  • [3] DUAN Q, 2001, LAND SURFACE HYDROLO, V4, P77
  • [4] A GENERALIZED STOCHASTIC HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL MODEL FOR FLOOD AND FLASH-FLOOD FORECASTING .1. FORMULATION
    GEORGAKAKOS, KP
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (13) : 2083 - 2095
  • [5] GEORGAKAKOS KP, 1992, P CCNAA AIT JOINT SE, P280
  • [6] GEORGAKAKOS KP, 2004, INT C STORMS AMOS MS, P23
  • [7] KOREN V, 2000, 15 C HYDR LONG BEACH
  • [8] MOGIL HM, 1978, B AM METEOROL SOC, V59, P690, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1978)059<0690:NFFWAD>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Overall distributed model intercomparison project results
    Reed, S
    Koren, V
    Smith, M
    Zhang, Z
    Moreda, F
    Seo, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) : 27 - 60