CO2 Laser Revision Stapedotomy

被引:18
作者
Albers, Andreas E. [1 ]
Schoenfeld, Uwe [1 ]
Kandilakis, Kostas [1 ]
Jovanovic, Sergije [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[2] DRK Kliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
CO2; laser; revision stapedotomy; scanner; otosclerosis; one-shot stapedotomy; hearing results; BONE-CONDUCTION; STAPES SURGERY; ARGON-LASER; STAPEDECTOMY; COCHLEA;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23864
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the one-shot noncontact technique in stapedotomy for revision stapes surgery with a CO2 laser combined with a scanning system. Study Design: Prospective study. Methods: Intraoperative findings and hearing results of 106 patients who underwent revision CO2 laser stapedotomy because of conductive or sensorineural hearing loss or vertigo were analyzed. Results: Leading pathologies were displacement of the prosthesis, incus erosion, fibrous adhesions, and bony reobliteration or a too long or too short prosthesis. Surgery was successfully performed in all cases with a noncontact technique resulting in significantly improved postoperative air and bone conduction. The rate of permanent complications was 0.9%. A comparison of the effect of higher laser energies used for the perforation of bony stapes footplates and lower energies for neomembranes revealed no significant difference in hearing results, underscoring the safety of the technique. Conclusions: To avoid any manipulation of the conductive hearing chain that may cause sensorineural hearing loss, we adapted the noncontact technique previously introduced by us for use in revision stapedotomy. This technique was successfully applied to improve conductive and sensorineural hearing loss as well as vertigo in first and second revision stapedotomy cases. Because the rate of postoperative complications was comparable to what is achieved with other laser systems, we conclude that the method has at least an equal level of safety. In conclusion, we advocate the use of a noncontact technique as suitable for an early revision of failed stapedotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1526
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
CRABTREE JA, 1980, LARYNGOSCOPE, V90, P224
[2]   Malleostapedotomy in revision surgery for otosclerosis [J].
Fisch, U ;
Acar, GÖ ;
Huber, AM .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (06) :776-785
[3]  
GHERINI SG, 1990, LARYNGOSCOPE, V100, P1276
[4]   REVISION STAPEDECTOMY SURGERY [J].
GLASSCOCK, ME ;
MCKENNAN, KX ;
LEVINE, SC .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1987, 96 (02) :141-148
[5]   A review of 308 cases of revision stapedectomy [J].
Hammerschlag, PE ;
Fishman, A ;
Scheer, AA .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1998, 108 (12) :1794-1800
[6]  
HORN KL, 1994, AM J OTOL, V15, P383
[7]  
Jovanovic S, 1996, LASER SURG MED, V19, P424, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:4<424::AID-LSM7>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-2
[9]  
JOVANOVIC S, 1995, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V252, P422
[10]   CO2 laser stapedotomy with the "one-shot" technique -: clinical results [J].
Jovanovic, S ;
Schönfeld, U ;
Scherer, H .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2004, 131 (05) :750-757