Evaluating and Improving Questions on an Unproctored Online General Chemistry Exam

被引:9
作者
Clark, Ted M. [1 ]
Turner, Daniel A. [1 ]
Rostam, Darian C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
General Public; First-Year Undergraduate; General; Distance Learning; Self Instruction; Testing; Assessment; CONCEPT INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; STUDENTS; ENVIRONMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00603
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Administering exams in large enrollment courses is challenging and systems in place for accomplishing this task were upended in the spring of 2020 when a sudden transformation to online instruction and testing occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the following year, when courses remained online, approaches to improve exam security included measures like using test banks and reducing the allotted time for completing exams to reduce the sharing of information. A psychometric comparison using classical test theory of an unproctored online exam with one delivered in-person indicates both have comparable reliability. However, item-level analysis demonstrates some questions performed higher in the unproctored setting, with an important variable being the item's searchability online. Revising questions to increase generalizability and reduce searchability mitigate these performance differences. Further, changing the format for questions involving calculations from multiple-choice to open response with random number generation was found to increase difficulty and item discrimination and is a viable approach for improving exam security.
引用
收藏
页码:3510 / 3521
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Alessio HM, 2017, ONLINE LEARN, V21, P146
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design
[4]   A Psychometric Analysis of the Chemical Concepts Inventory [J].
Barbera, Jack .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (05) :546-553
[5]   Barriers to Online Learning in the Time of COVID-19: A National Survey of Medical Students in the Philippines [J].
Baticulon, Ronnie E. ;
Sy, Jinno Jenkin ;
Alberto, Nicole Rose, I ;
Baron, Maria Beatriz C. ;
Mabulay, Robert Earl C. ;
Rizada, Lloyd Gabriel T. ;
Tiu, Christl Jan S. ;
Clarion, Charlie A. ;
Reyes, John Carlo B. .
MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2021, 31 (02) :615-626
[6]   Development of the Flame Test Concept Inventory: Measuring Student Thinking about Atomic Emission [J].
Bretz, Stacey Lowery ;
Mayo, Ana Vasquez Murata .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 95 (01) :17-27
[7]   Students' Understandings of Acid Strength: How Meaningful Is Reliability When Measuring Alternative Conceptions? [J].
Bretz, Stacey Lowery ;
McClary, LaKeisha .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 92 (02) :212-219
[8]  
Brown T. L., 2018, CHEM CENTRAL SCI
[9]   Online learning and COVID-19: a meta-synthesis analysis [J].
Camargo, Cristina Pires ;
Tempski, Patricia Zen ;
Busnardo, Fabio Freitas ;
Martins, Milton de Arruda ;
Gemperli, Rolf .
CLINICS, 2020, 75
[10]   Do outcomes from high stakes examinations taken in test centres and via live remote proctoring differ? [J].
Cherry, Gemma ;
O'Leary, Michael ;
Naumenko, Oksana ;
Kuan, Li-Ann ;
Waters, Linda .
COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN, 2021, 2