Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers

被引:58
作者
Wood, Susan [1 ]
Beeson, Tishra [1 ]
Bruen, Brian [1 ]
Goldberg, Debora Goetz [1 ]
Mead, Holly [1 ]
Shin, Peter [1 ]
Rosenbaum, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Policy, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
Family planning; Reproductive health services; Community health centers; Contraceptive methods; CONTRACEPTIVE PILL; PROVISION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a major and growing source of primary care for low-income women of reproductive age; however, only limited knowledge exists on the scope of family planning care they provide and the mechanisms for delivery of these essential reproductive health services, including family planning In this paper, we report on the scope of services provided at FQHCs including on-site provision, prescription only and referral options for the range of contraceptive methods. Study Design: An original survey of 423 FQHC organizations was fielded in 2011. Results: Virtually all FQHCs reported that they provide at least one contraceptive method (99.8%) at one or more clinical sites. A large majority (87%) of FQHCs report that their largest primary care site prescribes oral contraceptives plus one additional method category of contraception, with oral contraception and injectables being the most commonly available methods. Substantial variation is seen among other methods such as intrauterine devices (IUDs), contraceptive implants, the patch, vaginal ring and barrier methods. For all method categories, Title-X-funded sites are more likely to provide the method, though, even in these sites, IUDs and implants are much less likely to be provided than other methods. Conclusion: There is clearly wide variability in the delivery of family planning services at FQHCs in terms of methods available, level of counseling, and provision of services on-site or through prescription or referral. Barriers to provision likely include cost to patients and/or additional training to providers for some methods, such as IUDs and implants, but these barriers should not limit on-site availability of inexpensive methods such as oral contraceptives. Implications: With the expansion of contraceptive coverage under private insurance as part of preventive health services for women, along with expanded coverage for the currently uninsured, and the growth of FQHCs as the source of care for women of reproductive age, it is critical that women seeking family planning services at FQHCs have access to a wide range of contraceptive options. Our study both highlights the essential role of FQHCs in providing family planning services and also identifies remaining gaps in the provision of contraception in FQHC settings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 90
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Obstet Gynecol, V116, P469, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb30f
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, UN DAT SYST 2000 11
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V48, P241
  • [4] Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)
    Beeson, Tishra
    Wood, Susan
    Bruen, Brian
    Goldberg, Debora Goetz
    Mead, Holly
    Rosenbaum, Sara
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [5] Cost as a Barrier to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use in Adolescents
    Eisenberg, David
    McNicholas, Colleen
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2013, 52 (04) : S59 - S63
  • [6] Should Providers Give Women Advance Provision of Emergency Contraceptive Pills? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Foster, Diana G.
    Raine, Tina R.
    Brindis, Claire
    Rostovtseva, Daria P.
    Darney, Philip D.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2010, 20 (04) : 242 - 247
  • [7] Number of Oral Contraceptive Pill Packages Dispensed and Subsequent Unintended Pregnancies
    Foster, Diana Greene
    Hulett, Denis
    Bradsberry, Mary
    Darney, Philip
    Policar, Michael
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03) : 566 - 572
  • [8] Frost J.J., 2012, Variation in service delivery practices among clinics providing publicly funded family planning services in 2010
  • [9] Challenges in translating evidence to practice - The provision of intrauterine contraception
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    Blum, Maya
    de Bocanegra, Heike Thiel
    Darney, Philip D.
    Speidel, J. Joseph
    Policar, Michael
    Drey, Eleanor A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06) : 1359 - 1369
  • [10] Harper CC, 2012, FAM MED, V44, P637