Uncertainty and binary stochastic choice

被引:4
作者
Ryan, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Econ, 120 Mayoral Dr, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
关键词
Choice under uncertainty; Stochastic choice; Fechner models; EXPECTED UTILITY; SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY; CARDINAL UTILITY; DECISION-MAKING; RISKY CHOICE; INDEPENDENCE; ADDITIVITY; AMBIGUITY; MODELS; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-017-1033-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experimental evidence suggests that decision-making has a stochastic element and is better described through choice probabilities than preference relations. Binary choice probabilities admit a strong utility representation if there exists a utility function u such that the probability of choosing a over b is a strictly increasing function of the utility difference . Debreu (Econometrica 26(3):440-444, 1958) obtained a simple set of sufficient conditions for the existence of a strong utility representation when alternatives are drawn from a suitably rich domain. Dagsvik (Math Soc Sci 55:341-370, 2008) specialised Debreu's result to the domain of lotteries (risky prospects) and provided axiomatic foundations for a strong utility representation in which the underlying utility function conforms to expected utility. This paper considers general mixture set domains. These include the domain of lotteries, but also the domain of Anscombe-Aumann acts: uncertain prospects in the form of state-contingent lotteries. For the risky domain, we show that one of Dagsvik's axioms can be weakened. For the uncertain domain, we provide axiomatic foundations for a strong utility representation in which the utility function represents invariant biseparable preferences (Ghirardato et al. in J Econ Theory 118:133-173, 2004). The latter is a wide class that includes subjective expected utility, Choquet expected utility and maxmin expected utility preferences. We prove a specialised strong utility representation theorem for each of these special cases.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 662
页数:34
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Experiments on Compound Risk in Relation to Simple Risk and to Ambiguity [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Klibanoff, Peter ;
Placido, Laetitia .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (06) :1306-1322
[2]   A DEFINITION OF SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
ANSCOMBE, FJ ;
AUMANN, RJ .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1963, 34 (01) :199-&
[3]   How much ambiguity aversion? Finding indifferences between Ellsberg's risky and ambiguous bets [J].
Binmore, Ken ;
Stewart, Lisa ;
Voorhoeve, Alex .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2012, 45 (03) :215-238
[4]   Stochastic utility theorem [J].
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 44 (11) :1049-1056
[5]   Probabilistic subjective expected utility [J].
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 48 (01) :47-50
[6]   A Model of Probabilistic Choice Satisfying First-Order Stochastic Dominance [J].
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (03) :542-548
[7]   Generalized expected utility, heteroscedastic error, and path dependence in risky choice [J].
Buschena, D ;
Zilberman, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2000, 20 (01) :67-88
[8]   Axiomatization of stochastic models for choice under uncertainty [J].
Dagsvik, John K. .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2008, 55 (03) :341-370
[9]   Stochastic models for risky choices: A comparison of different axiomatizations [J].
Dagsvik, John K. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 60 :81-88
[10]  
Davidson D., 1959, Measurement Definitions and Theories