Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)

被引:10
|
作者
Hu, Ming-Yu [1 ]
Wu, Yan-Ni [1 ]
McEvoy, Maureen Patricia [2 ]
Wang, Yan-Fang [1 ]
Cong, Wei-Lian [1 ]
Liu, Li-Ping [1 ]
Li, Xiao-Xia [1 ]
Zhou, Chun-Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Nanfang Hosp, 1838 Guangzhou Ave North, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Unit, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Evidence-based practice; Nurse; Instrument; Education; Validation; UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; PATIENT OUTCOMES; PRACTICE BELIEFS; SELF-EFFICACY; NURSES; RELIABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-020-02189-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Evidence-based practice (EBP) education or training are considered fundamental to building and strengthening an EBP culture, as well as to encouraging evidence-based academic and clinical practice in the nursing community. However, few valid and reliable instruments are available for the assessment of EBP teaching and learning in clinical nurses in China. Translation, reliability, and validity testing of the English Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP(2)Q), which has strong psychometric properties, may encourage evaluation and promote the implementation of EBP in Mainland China. Methods Based on established guidelines for the development of questionnaires, the English EBP(2)Q was translated and cross-culturally adapted. The Chinese version of the EBP(2)Q (EBP(2)Q-C) was validated using a sample of 543 nurses. Structural validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and the questionnaire was tested for convergent and criterion validity. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also evaluated. Results The content validity index demonstrated good content validity (>= 0.98). An eight-factor structure was obtained in the exploratory factor analysis, and verified by a three-order factor model from the confirmatory factor analysis (chi(2)/df = 2.001; RMSEA = 0.065; SRMR = 0.077; and CFI = 0.884). The Spearman's rank correlation analysis of the EBP(2)Q-C with the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire showed moderate correlations forPractice(0.58) andConfidence(0.68) and a low correlation forSympathy(0.32). Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant differences in terms of nurses' highest education, present position, EBP training, involvement in research programs, and level of understanding of English. Both the overall Cronbach's alpha and the Cronbach's alpha for the domains exceeded 0.70. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the domains ranged between 0.75 and 0.96, indicating satisfactory repeatability. Conclusions Except for the convergent validity of theSympathydomain, the EBP(2)Q-C provided evidence of validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be applied in EBP education or training assessment in Mainland China.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP2Q)
    Ming-Yu Hu
    Yan-Ni Wu
    Maureen Patricia McEvoy
    Yan-Fang Wang
    Wei-Lian Cong
    Li-Ping Liu
    Xiao-Xia Li
    Chun-Lan Zhou
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [2] Adaptation and validation of the Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q) for clinical postgraduates in a Chinese context
    Jia, Yitong
    Zhuang, Xinqi
    Zhang, Yao
    Meng, Ge
    Qin, Shijia
    Shi, Wen-Xin
    Wu, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Yin-Ping
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] Adaptation and validation of the Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP2Q) for clinical postgraduates in a Chinese context
    Yitong Jia
    Xinqi Zhuang
    Yao Zhang
    Ge Meng
    Shijia Qin
    Wen-Xin Shi
    Xiaojian Wu
    Yin-Ping Zhang
    BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [4] Validation study of the Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire
    Panczyk, Mariusz
    Belowska, Jaroslawa
    Zarzeka, Aleksander
    Samolinski, Lukasz
    Zmuda-Trzebiatowska, Halina
    Gotlib, Joanna
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 17
  • [5] The development and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: Japanese version
    Tomotaki, Ai
    Fukahori, Hiroki
    Sakai, Ikuko
    Kurokohchi, Kana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (02)
  • [6] Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP2) questionnaire in a Norwegian primary healthcare setting
    Landsverk, Nils Gunnar
    Olsen, Nina Rydland
    Titlestad, Kristine Berg
    Pripp, Are Hugo
    Brovold, Therese
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Translation and Validation of the Greek Version of the Evidence-Based Practice Competency Questionnaire for Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©)
    Schetaki, Stefania
    Patelarou, Evridiki
    Giakoumidakis, Konstantinos
    Trivli, Alexandra
    Kleisiaris, Christos
    Patelarou, Athina
    NURSING REPORTS, 2022, 12 (04) : 693 - 707
  • [8] Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire for Nurses
    Yang, Rumei
    Guo, Jia-Wen
    Beck, Susan L.
    Jiang, Fen
    Tang, Siyuan
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2019, 27 (03) : E117 - E131
  • [9] Validation study of the Polish version of the Evidence-Based Practice Profile Questionnaire
    Mariusz Panczyk
    Jarosława Belowska
    Aleksander Zarzeka
    Łukasz Samoliński
    Halina Żmuda-Trzebiatowska
    Joanna Gotlib
    BMC Medical Education, 17
  • [10] Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation
    Ruzafa-Martinez, Maria
    Fernandez-Salazar, Serafin
    Leal-Costa, Cesar
    Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesus
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2020, 17 (05) : 366 - 375