The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations

被引:6
作者
Alessandroni, Nicolas [1 ]
Rodriguez, Cintia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid Spain, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, C Ivan Pavlov 6, Madrid 28049, Spain
来源
PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA | 2020年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
Concepts; Categorisation; Cognitive development; Early childhood; Research methodology; BASIC-LEVEL; YOUNG-CHILDREN; INDUCTIVE GENERALIZATION; INFANTS CATEGORIZATION; OBJECT CATEGORIZATION; CATEGORICAL DIFFERENTIATION; 3-MONTH-OLD INFANTS; SUBORDINATE-LEVEL; SAMPLE-SIZE; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We present a systematic and qualitative review of academic literature on early conceptual development (0-24 months of age), with an emphasis on methodological aspects. The final sample of our review included 281 studies reported in 115 articles. The main aims of the article were four: first, to organise studies into sets according to methodological similarities and differences; second, to elaborate on the methodological procedures that characterise each set; third, to circumscribe the empirical indicators that different sets of studies consider as proof of the existence of concepts in early childhood; last, to identify methodological limitations and to propose possible ways to overcome them. We grouped the studies into five sets:preference and habituation experiments,category extension tasks,object sorting tasks,sequential touching tasksandobject examination tasks. In the "Results" section, we review the core features of each set of studies. In the "Discussion" and "Conclusions" sections, we describe, for one thing, the most relevant methodological shortcomings. We end by arguing that a situated, semiotic and pragmatic perspective that emphasises the importance of ecological validity could open up new avenues of research to better understand the development of concepts in early childhood.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 174 条
[21]   Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy [J].
BehlChadha, G .
COGNITION, 1996, 60 (02) :105-141
[23]   THE NATURE AND STRUCTURE OF INFANT FORM CATEGORIES [J].
BOMBA, PC ;
SIQUELAND, ER .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 35 (02) :294-328
[24]   The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant [J].
Bonatti, L ;
Frot, E ;
Zangl, R ;
Mehler, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 44 (04) :388-426
[25]   Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants [J].
Booth, AE ;
Waxman, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 38 (06) :948-957
[26]   Object function and categorization in infancy: Two mechanisms of facilitation [J].
Booth, Amy E. .
INFANCY, 2006, 10 (02) :145-169
[27]   Specifying the role of function in infant categorization [J].
Booth, Amy E. ;
Schuler, Kathryn ;
Zajicek, Ruth .
INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 33 (04) :672-684
[28]  
Borghi A., 2005, Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, P8
[29]   Experience-Based and On-Line Categorization of Objects in Early Infancy [J].
Bornstein, Marc H. ;
Mash, Clay .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 81 (03) :884-897
[30]   The Development of Object Categorization in Young Children: Hierarchical Inclusiveness, Age, Perceptual Attribute, and Group Versus Individual Analyses [J].
Bornstein, Marc H. ;
Arterberry, Martha E. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (02) :350-365