Why crop yields in developing countries have not kept pace with advances in agronomy

被引:71
作者
George, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vipani, 1555 W Middlefield Rd 82, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
来源
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT | 2014年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Agronomy; Improved germplasm; Green Revolution; Yield gap; Sustainable intensification; Agricultural footprint; ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION; USE EFFICIENCY; RISK-AVERSION; RICE; REVOLUTION; WHEAT; AGRICULTURE; NITROGEN; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gfs.2013.10.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Crop research generates two distinct sets of products: improved germplasm and advances in agronomy technologies and knowledge/techniques to efficiently exploit the germplasm yield potential (Yp). The success of the Green Revolution was largely due to high farmer adoption of improved germplasm along with subsidized inputs that greatly increased average yield (Ya) from a low base. Although farmers adopted irrigation, fertilizers, machinery and other inputs that changed their agronomy and led to robust total factor productivity (TFP) growth, the Ya remained well below Yp indicating poor agronomy practice. Policies focusing on total production to meet food demand have also contributed to expansion of harvested area at low Ya and low input efficiency (low productivity of land, labor, water, fertilizer or other). Yield growth has since slowed or Ya has stalled at low levels unlike in developed countries where Ya advanced markedly closer to Yp. This paper argues that poor agronomy practice in developing countries is because of farmers' rational perception, regardless of their information needs, of high risks and low returns which do not justify the additional investments in labor and inputs required to systematically practice agronomy. As such, farmers default to low -risk, low -yield practices, even though they would temporarily switch to high -yield practices in low -risk settings, such as in agricultural projects. With poor agronomy practice, there is also little market feedback in developing countries for agronomy research products. Therefore, the potential for agronomy to dramatically increase Ya and productivity remains untapped in developing countries. To increase farmer yields and incomes without enlarging the agricultural footprint at low Ya, this paper argues that the focus must shift from relying mainly on germplasm-driven increases in total production to increasing both Ya and productivity of inputs through effective agronomy practice. This requires creating low -risk, high -return market settings for the average developing country farmer. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 58
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [21] Dawe D., 2010, The rice crisis: markets, policies and food security, P15
  • [22] Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi: Toward an African Green Revolution
    Denning, Glenn
    Kabambe, Patrick
    Sanchez, Pedro
    Malik, Alia
    Flor, Rafael
    Harawa, Rebbie
    Nkhoma, Phelire
    Zamba, Colleen
    Banda, Clement
    Magombo, Chrispin
    Keating, Michael
    Wangila, Justine
    Sachs, Jeffrey
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (01) : 2 - 10
  • [23] Reversal of rice yield decline in a long-term continuous cropping experiment
    Dobermann, A
    Dawe, D
    Roetter, RP
    Cassman, KG
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (04) : 633 - 643
  • [24] Dobermann A., 2003, Fluid focus: The third decade. Proc. 2003 Fluid Forum, Vol.20, Scottsdale, V20, P67
  • [25] Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States
    Duvick, DN
    Cassman, KG
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1999, 39 (06) : 1622 - 1630
  • [26] Elliott N.C., 2010, Wheat production and pest management for the Great Plains region, P1
  • [27] Evenson R.E., 1999, IFPRI Research Report 109
  • [28] FARM SIZE, RISK-AVERSION AND THE ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    FEDER, G
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1980, 32 (02): : 263 - 283
  • [29] Fernandez A. T., 2012, Working Paper - Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University
  • [30] Field to Market, 2012, 2 FIELD MARK