Interaction of life-cycle phases in a probabilistic life-cycle framework for civil infrastructure system sustainability

被引:12
作者
Padgett, Jamie E. [1 ]
Vishnu, Navya [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life-cycle sustainability; probabilistic; interaction; uncertainties; surrogate models; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; RISK-ASSESSMENT; COST DESIGN; ENERGY; RELIABILITY; BRIDGES; OPTIMIZATION; MAINTENANCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/23789689.2019.1574514
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Infrastructure system sustainability is dependent on contributions from different life-cycle phases like construction, operation, maintenance, failure and end-of-life demolition. While existing life-cycle studies typically consider many of these phases, the life-cycle sustainability is often expressed in terms of an expected value or variance. Moreover, interactions between life-cycle phases such as maintenance and service load or hazard failure are often neglected. The proposed probabilistic life-cycle sustainability analysis (LCS-A) framework captures phase interactions and explores the distribution of sustainability costs to provide a more holistic view of an infrastructure's LCS. The model is capable of handling various sources of uncertainties, with propagation of uncertainties facilitated by use of surrogate models when predicting infrastructure failure with phase interactions. A demonstration of the probabilistic LCS framework for a concrete girder bridge highlights the importance of looking beyond expected values of life-cycle metrics, especially when interactions between life-cycle phases are considered. maintenance activities primarily benefit service load performance, they also enhance hazard performance, a previously unexplored interaction effect from life-cycle studies.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 310
页数:22
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [11] Chang S., 1996, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V2, P118, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(118)
  • [12] Chowdhury M., 2013, Rate of Deterioration of Bridges and Pavements as Affected by Trucks
  • [13] An environmental comparison of bridge forms
    Collings, D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 159 (04) : 163 - 168
  • [14] Life-Cycle Risk Assessment of Spatially Distributed Aging Bridges under Seismic and Traffic Hazards
    Deco, Alberto
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2013, 29 (01) : 127 - 153
  • [15] Sustainability of Highway Bridge Networks Under Seismic Hazard
    Dong, You
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    Saydam, Duygu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (01) : 41 - 66
  • [16] Interdependent Response of Networked Systems
    Duenas-Osorio, Leonardo
    Craig, James I.
    Goodno, Barry J.
    Bostrom, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [17] DuraCrete, 2000, BE951347 EUR UN
  • [18] Probabilistic analysis of resistance degradation of reinforced concrete bridge beams under corrosion
    Enright, MP
    Frangopol, DM
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1998, 20 (11) : 960 - 971
  • [19] FEMA, 2015, HAZUS MH 2.1, Technical Manual, Multi-Hazard Loss Assessment Methodology
  • [20] FHWA, 2016, NAT BRIDG INV DAT