Uncertainty estimations for seismic source inversions

被引:87
作者
Duputel, Zacharie [1 ]
Rivera, Luis [2 ,3 ]
Fukahata, Yukitoshi [4 ]
Kanamori, Hiroo [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Seismol Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CNRS, UMR 7516, IPGS, F-75700 Paris, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg EOST, Strasbourg, France
[4] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
关键词
Time-series analysis; Inverse theory; Earthquake source observations; Surface waves and free oscillations; WAVE-FORM INVERSION; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; EARTHQUAKE; FIELD; INFORMATION; PARAMETERS; FAULT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05554.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Source inversion is a widely used practice in seismology. Magnitudes, moment tensors, slip distributions are now routinely calculated and disseminated whenever an earthquake occurs. The accuracy of such models depends on many aspects like the event magnitude, the data coverage and the data quality (instrument response, isolation, timing, etc.). Here, like in any observational problem, the error estimation should be part of the solution. It is however very rare to find a source inversion algorithm which includes realistic error analyses, and the solutions are often given without any estimates of uncertainties. Our goal here is to stress the importance of such estimation and to explore different techniques aimed at achieving such analyses. In this perspective, we use the W phase source inversion algorithm recently developed to provide fast CMT estimations for large earthquakes. We focus in particular on the linear-inverse problem of estimating the moment tensor components at a given source location. We assume that the initial probability densities can be modelled by Gaussian distributions. Formally, we can separate two sources of error which generally contribute to the model parameter uncertainties. The first source of uncertainty is the error introduced by the more or less imperfect data. This is carried by the covariance matrix for the data (Cd). The second source of uncertainty, often overlooked, is associated with modelling error or mismodelling. This is represented by the covariance matrix on the theory, CT. Among the different sources of mismodelling, we focus here on the modelling error associated with the mislocation of the centroid position. Both Cd and CT describe probability densities in the data space and it is well known that it is in fact CD=Cd+CT that should be included into the error propagation process. In source inversion problems, like in many other fields of geophysics, the data covariance (CD) is often considered as diagonal or even proportional to the identity matrix. In this work, we demonstrate the importance of using a more realistic form for CD. If we incorporate accurate covariance components during the inversion process, it refines the posterior error estimates but also improves the solution itself. We discuss these issues using several synthetic tests and by applying the W phase source inversion algorithm to several large earthquakes such as the recent 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The contribution of source parameter estimations and ground motion simulations in integrating input data for seismic hazard assessment: an application to the volcanic island of Ischia (Italy)
    Tusa, Giuseppina
    Convertito, Vincenzo
    D'Amico, Salvatore
    Giampiccolo, Elisabetta
    Langer, Horst
    Azzaro, Raffaele
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 23 (04) : 1297 - 1324
  • [32] Line-source simulation for shallow-seismic data. Part 1: theoretical background
    Forbriger, Thomas
    Groos, Lisa
    Schaefer, Martin
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 198 (03) : 1387 - 1404
  • [33] Quantifying Site Effects and Their Influence on Earthquake Source Parameter Estimations Using a Dense Array in Oklahoma
    Chang, Hilary
    Abercrombie, Rachel E.
    Nakata, Nori
    Pennington, Colin N.
    Kemna, Kilian B.
    Cochran, Elizabeth S.
    Harrington, Rebecca M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2023, 128 (09)
  • [34] A new approach on seismic mortality estimations based on average population density
    Xiaoxin Zhu
    Baiqing Sun
    Zhanyong Jin
    Earthquake Science, 2016, (06) : 337 - 344
  • [35] Sensitivity of earthquake source inversions to atmospheric noise and corrections of InSAR data
    Scott, Chelsea Phipps
    Lohman, Rowena Benfer
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (05) : 4031 - 4044
  • [36] Source spectra of seismic hum
    Nishida, Kiwamu
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 199 (01) : 416 - 429
  • [37] Assessing the effectiveness of the shear-tensile-compressive model in earthquake source inversions: synthetic experiments and field application
    Ren, Yi
    Vavrycuk, Vaclav
    Zhao, Li
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 236 (01) : 161 - 173
  • [38] BSHAP seismic source characterization models for the Western Balkan region
    Mihaljevic, Jadranka
    Zupancic, Polona
    Kuka, Neki
    Kaluderovic, Natasa
    Koci, Rexhep
    Markusic, Snjezana
    Salic, Radmila
    Dushi, Edmond
    Begu, Enkela
    Duni, Llambro
    Zivcic, Mladen
    Kovacevic, Svetlana
    Ivancic, Ines
    Kovacevic, Vladan
    Milutinovic, Zoran
    Vakilinezhad, Marjan
    Fiket, Tomislav
    Gulerce, Zeynep
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (10) : 3963 - 3985
  • [39] Insights on Multistage Rock Avalanche Behavior From Runout Modeling Constrained by Seismic Inversions
    Mitchell, A.
    Allstadt, K. E.
    George, D.
    Aaron, J.
    McDougall, S.
    Moore, J.
    Menounos, B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2022, 127 (10)
  • [40] Uncertainty assessment for the seismic hazard map of Spain
    Gaspar-Escribano, J. M.
    Rivas-Medina, A.
    Parra, H.
    Cabanas, L.
    Benito, B.
    Ruiz Barajas, S.
    Martinez Solares, J. M.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2015, 199 : 62 - 73