Uncertainty estimations for seismic source inversions

被引:88
作者
Duputel, Zacharie [1 ]
Rivera, Luis [2 ,3 ]
Fukahata, Yukitoshi [4 ]
Kanamori, Hiroo [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Seismol Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CNRS, UMR 7516, IPGS, F-75700 Paris, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg EOST, Strasbourg, France
[4] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
关键词
Time-series analysis; Inverse theory; Earthquake source observations; Surface waves and free oscillations; WAVE-FORM INVERSION; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; EARTHQUAKE; FIELD; INFORMATION; PARAMETERS; FAULT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05554.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Source inversion is a widely used practice in seismology. Magnitudes, moment tensors, slip distributions are now routinely calculated and disseminated whenever an earthquake occurs. The accuracy of such models depends on many aspects like the event magnitude, the data coverage and the data quality (instrument response, isolation, timing, etc.). Here, like in any observational problem, the error estimation should be part of the solution. It is however very rare to find a source inversion algorithm which includes realistic error analyses, and the solutions are often given without any estimates of uncertainties. Our goal here is to stress the importance of such estimation and to explore different techniques aimed at achieving such analyses. In this perspective, we use the W phase source inversion algorithm recently developed to provide fast CMT estimations for large earthquakes. We focus in particular on the linear-inverse problem of estimating the moment tensor components at a given source location. We assume that the initial probability densities can be modelled by Gaussian distributions. Formally, we can separate two sources of error which generally contribute to the model parameter uncertainties. The first source of uncertainty is the error introduced by the more or less imperfect data. This is carried by the covariance matrix for the data (Cd). The second source of uncertainty, often overlooked, is associated with modelling error or mismodelling. This is represented by the covariance matrix on the theory, CT. Among the different sources of mismodelling, we focus here on the modelling error associated with the mislocation of the centroid position. Both Cd and CT describe probability densities in the data space and it is well known that it is in fact CD=Cd+CT that should be included into the error propagation process. In source inversion problems, like in many other fields of geophysics, the data covariance (CD) is often considered as diagonal or even proportional to the identity matrix. In this work, we demonstrate the importance of using a more realistic form for CD. If we incorporate accurate covariance components during the inversion process, it refines the posterior error estimates but also improves the solution itself. We discuss these issues using several synthetic tests and by applying the W phase source inversion algorithm to several large earthquakes such as the recent 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic moment and volume change of a spherical source
    Kumagai, Hiroyuki
    Maeda, Yuta
    Ichihara, Mie
    Kame, Nobuki
    Kusakabe, Tetsuya
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2014, 66
  • [22] GBO algorithm for seismic source parameters inversion
    Wang, Leyang
    Li, Han
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2023, 14 (02) : 182 - 190
  • [23] Strong-Motion and Teleseismic Waveform Inversions for the Source Process of the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake
    Poiata, Natalia
    Miyake, Hiroe
    Koketsu, Kazuki
    Hikima, Kazuhito
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (04) : 1477 - 1496
  • [24] On the development of a seismic source zonation model for seismic hazard assessment in western Saudi Arabia
    Zahran, Hani M.
    Sokolov, Vladimir
    Roobol, M. John
    Stewart, Ian C. F.
    Youssef, Salah El-Hadidy
    El-Hadidy, Mahmoud
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2016, 20 (03) : 747 - 769
  • [25] Rayleigh-wave multicomponent crosscorrelation-based source strength distribution inversions. Part 2: A workflow for field seismic data
    Xu Z.
    Dylan Mikesell T.
    Umlauft J.
    Gribler G.
    Geophysical Journal International, 2021, 222 (03) : 2084 - 2101
  • [26] Measurements and kernels for source-structure inversions in noise tomography
    Hanasoge, Shravan M.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 196 (02) : 971 - 985
  • [27] Tsunami source uncertainty estimation: The 2011 Japan tsunami
    Dettmer, Jan
    Hawkins, Rhys
    Cummins, Phil R.
    Hossen, Jakir
    Sambridge, Malcolm
    Hino, Ryota
    Inazu, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (06) : 4483 - 4505
  • [28] Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the United Arab Emirates using integrated seismic source model
    Barakat, Samer A.
    Arab, Mohamed G.
    Awad, Raghad A.
    Malkawi, Dima A. Husein
    Metawa, Abdulrahman
    Omar, Maher
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES-X, 2024, 11
  • [29] Resolution of Seismic-Moment Tensor Inversions from a Single Array of Receivers
    Rodriguez, Ismael Vera
    Gu, Yu J.
    Sacchi, Mauricio D.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 101 (06) : 2634 - 2642
  • [30] A new approach on seismic mortality estimations based on average population density
    Zhu, Xiaoxin
    Sun, Baiqing
    Jin, Zhanyong
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2016, 29 (06) : 337 - 344