A comparison of energy use efficiency and economic analysis of wheat and sunflower production in Turkey: A case study in Thrace Region

被引:76
|
作者
Unakitan, Gokhan [1 ]
Aydin, Basak [2 ]
机构
[1] Namik Kemal Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Econ, Tekirdag, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Soil & Water Agr Meteorol Res Inst, Kirklareli, Turkey
关键词
Energy efficiency; Renewable energy; Economic analysis; Wheat; Sunflower; Turkey; COTTON PRODUCTION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; APRICOT PRODUCTION; TILLAGE SYSTEMS; CROP PRODUCTION; COST-ANALYSIS; INPUT COSTS; PROVINCE; IRAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.033
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Main objectives of this study were to define total amount of input usage and do the economic comparison of wheat and sunflower production in Thrace Region in Turkey and to determine the energy equivalent of these inputs. The data of this study was collected by survey method which was carried out face to face with 169 wheat and sunflower producers in Thrace Region. The total energy inputs in wheat and sunflower production were determined to be 23,231 MJ ha(-1) and 10,139 MJ ha(-1) and based on the energy output, it was noticed that energy outputs in wheat (including straw) and sunflower production were determined to be 81,720 MJ and 38,250 MJ, respectively. Energy use efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy and net energy in wheat production were calculated as 3.52, 0.19 kg MJ(-1), 5.16 MJ kg(-1) and 58,489 MJ ha(-1) respectively in wheat production and 3.77, 0.15 kg MJ(-1), 6.63 MJ kg(-1) and 28,111 MJ ha(-1) respectively in sunflower production. Benefit-cost ratios were calculated as 1.20 for wheat and 1.02 for sunflower, by dividing the gross value of production by the total cost of production per hectare in wheat and sunflower production. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 285
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Energy Use Efficiency and Economic Analysis of Apple Production in Turkey: Case of Thrace Region
    Aydin, Basak
    Akturk, Duygu
    Ozkan, Erol
    Hurma, Harun
    Kiraci, Mehmet Ali
    ERWERBS-OBSTBAU, 2019, 61 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [2] ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF SUNFLOWER PRODUCTION IN THRACE REGION OF TURKEY
    Keskin, G.
    Dellal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01): : 245 - 250
  • [3] Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of greenhouse cucumber farming in Turkey: case of Thrace Region
    Cebi, Ulviye Kamburoglu
    Aydin, Basak
    Cakir, Recep
    Altintas, Sureyya
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2019, 15 (02): : 2 - 21
  • [4] ENERGY AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF VETCH PRODUCTION IN TURKEY: A CASE STUDY FROM THRACE REGION
    Baran, Mehmet Firat
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2017, 26 (03): : 1967 - 1973
  • [5] Functional analysis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production in Turkey: A case study of Thrace region
    Semerci, Arif
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (01): : 436 - 440
  • [6] Determining the technical efficiency level of oily sunflower production by Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) Method: the case of Thrace Region, Turkey
    Semerci, Arif
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2023, 19 (04): : 27 - 46
  • [7] Energy consumption patterns and economic analysis of irrigated wheat and rainfed wheat production: Case study for Tokat region, Turkey
    Cicek, Adnan
    Altintas, Guelcin
    Erdal, Guelistan
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (3-4): : 639 - 644
  • [8] ENERGY CONSUMPTION PATTERNS AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF IRRIGATED WHEAT AND RAINFED WHEAT PRODUCTION: CASE STUDY FOR TOKAT REGION, TURKEY
    Cicek, A.
    Altintas, G.
    Erdal, G.
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2011, 17 (03): : 378 - 388
  • [9] Efficiency analysis in agricultural enterprises in Turkey: case of Thrace Region
    Aydin, Basak
    Unakitan, Gokhan
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2018, 14 (02): : 137 - 160
  • [10] ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BLACK CUMIN PRODUCTION IN TURKEY
    Yilmaz, Hasan
    Gokdogan, Osman
    Ozer, Seyma
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (10): : 11395 - 11401