Corporate Governance Decisions in Accounting Business Field for Increasing Competitiveness: Romania, France and Europe Comparison

被引:2
作者
Berinde, Sorin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Babes Bolyai Univ, Mihail Kogalniceanu St 1, Cluj Napoca 400174, Romania
来源
INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS | 2018年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
Accounting; Competitiveness; Corporate Governance; Financial Indicators; Financial Analysis; COUNTRY-LEVEL GOVERNANCE; FIRMS; ADVANTAGE; FOREIGN; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; INDICATORS; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.5755/j01.ee.29.3.17269
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Creating value for shareholders in terms of equity value growth significantly depends on the ability of corporate governance to make optimal decisions for the company's competitiveness. The article conducts a comparative study between Romania, France and the average recorded in the European Union regarding competitiveness in companies from the accounting business field for the timeframe 2008-2013. Competitiveness is measured as the average for the domestic-owned companies and separately for the foreign-owned companies. Competitiveness assessment is based on asset related elements, processes and performance. The key success factors used for assessing competitiveness are investment rate, gross operating rate, turnover per person employed, share of personal cost in production and added value. The data are collected through the European Statistical System and processed by means of competitiveness analysis methods used in the literature. The findings show that the competitiveness of Romanian and French companies from the accounting business field is above the European Union average. The hypothesis according to which the foreign-owned companies are more competitive than domestic-owned companies is partially confirmed. The foreign owned companies are increasing their competitiveness by reducing labour cost and increasing productivity and added value. They invest far less than companies with local ownership.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 311
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Assessing global competitiveness under multi-criteria perspective [J].
Perez-Moreno, Salvador ;
Rodriguez, Beatriz ;
Luque, Mariano .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 53 :398-408
[42]  
Porter M.E., 2013, Competitiveness at a crossroads: Findings of Harvard Business School's 2012 survey on U.S. competitiveness
[43]  
Porter M. E., 2011, SIMON AND SCHUSTER
[44]  
PORTER ME, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P73
[45]   Investor protection and country-level governance: cross-country empirical panel data evidence [J].
Rachisan, Paula Ramona ;
Bota-Avram, Cristina ;
Grosanu, Adrian .
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2017, 30 (01) :806-817
[46]  
Ross JW, 1996, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P31
[47]  
Shee H., 2002, COMPETITIVENESS TECH
[48]   A framework for evaluating technology management process [J].
Skilbeck, JN ;
Cruickshank, CM .
INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, :138-142
[49]  
Smith S., 1995, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, V5, P36, DOI DOI 10.1108/09604520510585316%5CN
[50]  
Snieska V., 2015, INZINERINE EKONOMIKA, V59