Effects of Moral Judgement, Emotional Control and Problem solving on Information Ethics of Gifted Students in Computer Science

被引:1
作者
Kim, HanSung [1 ]
Nam, Sooleen [2 ]
Lee, WonGyu [3 ]
Nam, KiChun [4 ]
Kwon, DaiYoung [5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Comp Sci Educ, Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Psychol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Comp Sci Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Coll Liberal Arts, Dept Psychol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Creat Informat & Comp Inst, Seoul, South Korea
来源
2013 IEEE 37TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (COMPSACW) | 2013年
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
gifted students in computer science; information ethics; moral jugdement; emotional control; problem solving in computer science;
D O I
10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.103
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The importance of information ethics has emerged with the advent of the information and knowledge society. Especially, information ethics education and research about gifted students in computer science (CS gifted students), who play key influencers in IT development, is becoming more important. But the amount of systematic research on CS gifted students' information ethics is insufficient. This study measured the information ethics level of CS gifted students and also analyzed various factors that influence information ethics. For this study, 30 CS gifted students were selected and their levels of information ethics, moral judgment and problem solving abilities with regards to computer science (CS problem solving) were measured, then their abilities to control their emotions were measured through a cognitive psychological method. The results of the analysis showed that there were no significant demographic component differences (gender and grade level), but moral judgment level and emotional control were the highest correlating variables for information ethics, with moral judgment being the most influential factor.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] How Internet Users' Privacy Concerns Have Evolved since 2002
    Anton, Annie I.
    Earp, Julia B.
    Young, Jessica D.
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2010, 8 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [2] Beale A. V., 2007, CLEARING HOUSE, P8
  • [3] Campbell M.A., 2005, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, V15, P68, DOI [10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68, DOI 10.1375/AJGC.15.1.68]
  • [4] Cummings R, 2010, TEACH COLL REC, V112, P621
  • [5] Emotion, regulation, and moral development
    Eisenberg, N
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 : 665 - 697
  • [6] Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns
    Fogel, Joshua
    Nehmad, Elham
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [7] How (and where) does moral judgment work?
    Greene, J
    Haidt, J
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (12) : 517 - 523
  • [8] The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment
    Greene, JD
    Nystrom, LE
    Engell, AD
    Darley, JM
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. NEURON, 2004, 44 (02) : 389 - 400
  • [9] An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment
    Greene, JD
    Sommerville, RB
    Nystrom, LE
    Darley, JM
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5537) : 2105 - 2108
  • [10] Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
    Greene, Joshua D.
    Morelli, Sylvia A.
    Lowenberg, Kelly
    Nvstrom, Leieh E.
    Cohen, Jonathan D.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2008, 107 (03) : 1144 - 1154