The effects of gastric bands of different synthetic materials on the gastric and esophageal mucosa: an experimental study

被引:12
作者
Bozbora, A
Coskun, H
Barbaros, U
Sari, S
Asoglu, O
机构
[1] Istanbul Med Sch, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Sisli Etfal Training & Res Hosp, Gen Surg Dept 3, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
bariatric surgery; morbid obesity; gastric band; prosthetic materials; intragastric migration; gastroesophageal reflux;
D O I
10.1381/096089204322857645
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastric and mucosal changes were studied when different synthetic materials were used for gastric banding. Methods: 60 Wistar-Albino rats (weight 200-250 g, age 12 weeks) were classified into 5 groups. Gastric banding was carried out with different materials: group 1 - polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), group 2 - polythylene (PE), group 3 - polypropylene (PP), group 4 - silicone; and group 5 - controls. Histopathological examination of proximal and distal gastric mucosa and esophagus were evaluated for foreign body reaction, lymphocytic infiltration, neutrophil infiltration, gastric wall invasion, and gastroesophageal reflux, Results: PE and PP caused a much more severe foreign body reaction that PTFE and silicone. Lymphocytic infiltration (chronic inflammation) was not significantly different between PP, PE, and PTFE, and was present in 80% of rats with these materials (P>0.05); in the silicone group, lymphocytic reaction was minimal. There was no neutrophilic infiltration in the silicone group (P=0.001), but this sign of acute inflammation was present in the other groups. However, the neutrophilic infiltration showed no difference between PE, PTFE and PR PP, PE and PTFE migrated into the gastric wall at similar rates (no significant difference, P>0.05); in the silicone group, however, intragastric migration was not observed. With regard to gastroesophageal reflux, no significant difference was found between all the groups (P>0.05). In all groups, no histopathologic change was observed in the gastric mucosa proximal and distal to the bands. Conclusion: Silicone was the ideal material for banding, because it had good tissue adaptation and caused no inflammatory response.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 252
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF GASTRIC BANDING FOR TREATMENT OF MORBID-OBESITY IN PIGS [J].
COELHO, JCU ;
SOLHAUG, JH ;
MOODY, FG ;
LI, YF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 149 (02) :228-231
[2]   Adjustable gastric banding: 5-year experience [J].
Doldi, SB ;
Micheletto, G ;
Lattuada, E ;
Zappa, MA ;
Bona, D ;
Sonvico, U .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2000, 10 (02) :171-173
[3]   Band erosion: Incidence, etiology, management and outcome after banded vertical gastric bypass [J].
Fobi, M ;
Lee, H ;
Igwe, D ;
Felahy, B ;
James, E ;
Stanczyk, M ;
Fobi, N .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2001, 11 (06) :699-707
[4]   Complications following Swedish adjustable gastric banding:: A long-term follow-up [J].
Forsell, P ;
Hallerbäck, B ;
Glise, H ;
Hellers, G .
OBESITY SURGERY, 1999, 9 (01) :11-16
[5]  
KOLLE K, 1982, P 7 C ORG MOND GASTR, P37
[6]  
Kuzmak, 1991, Obes Surg, V1, P403, DOI 10.1381/096089291765560809
[7]   STANDARDIZED GASTROPLASTY ORIFICE [J].
LAWS, HL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 141 (03) :393-394
[8]   Adjustable gastric banding: Advantages and disadvantages [J].
Lucchese, M ;
Alessio, F ;
Valeri, A ;
Cantelli, G ;
Venneri, F ;
Borrelli, D .
OBESITY SURGERY, 1999, 9 (03) :269-271
[9]  
MASON EE, 1982, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V117, P701
[10]   Uncommon intragastric migration of the Swedish adjustable gastric band [J].
Mittermair, RP ;
Weiss, H ;
Nehoda, H ;
Aigner, F .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2002, 12 (03) :372-375