Concentration of ammonium diuranate effluent by reverse osmosis and forward osmosis membrane processes

被引:8
作者
Ghosh, A. K. [1 ]
Bindal, R. C. [1 ]
Prabhakar, S. [1 ]
Tewari, P. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bhabha Atom Res Ctr, Desalinat Div, Bombay 400085, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Cellulose acetate blend; Forward osmosis; Membrane; Radioactive waste treatment; Reverses osmosis; Thin-film composite polyamide; RADIOACTIVE-WASTES; LIQUID; SEPARATION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2013.808449
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this study, both reverse osmosis (RO) and forward osmosis (FO) experiments are conducted to concentrate simulated inactive ammonium diuranate (ADU) filtered effluent solution (by mixing uranyl nitrate and ammonium nitrate) using indigenously developed cellulose acetate blend (CAB) and thin-film composite polyamide (TFCP) membranes. Both the membranes are prepared and characterized in terms of pure water permeability and solute rejection for 2000ppm NaCl feed, water contact angle and surface average roughness. Subsequently, testing of volume reduction and concentration of simulated ADU effluent solution are carried out using custom made RO and FO testing systems. It is found that in RO process, the performance in terms of volume reduction factor and concentration factor with respect to uranium for both CAB and TFCP membranes are comparable but the CAB membranes show better performance than the TFCP membranes in FO modes. The concentration of ammonium nitrate is less in RO concentrate than in the FO concentrates. Similar experiments with the feed solution having different concentration of uranium (1-20ppm) with same concentration of ammonium nitrate show that in FO, almost no leaching of uranium is found to the draw solution side but in RO, some of the uranium starts passing to the permeate side, particularly at lower concentration of uranium in the feed.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 437
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Agarwal S.K., 2003, NUCL ENERGY PRINCIPL, P245
[2]   Membrane purification in radioactive waste management: a short review [J].
Ambashta, Ritu D. ;
Sillanpaa, Mika E. T. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2012, 105 :76-84
[3]   Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments [J].
Cath, Tzahi Y. ;
Childress, Amy E. ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :70-87
[4]  
Charlesworth D.H., 1989, P SERIES IAEA, VI
[5]   Membrane technologies for liquid radioactive waste treatment [J].
Chmielewski, AG ;
Harasimowicz, M ;
Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G .
CZECHOSLOVAK JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1999, 49 :979-985
[6]   Concentration of low- and medium-level radioactive wastes with three-stage reverse osmosis pilot plant [J].
Chmielewski, AG ;
Harasimowicz, M ;
Tyminski, B ;
Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 36 (5-6) :1117-1127
[7]   Distillation of radioactive liquid organic wastes for subsequent wet oxidation [J].
Fabiano, B ;
Pastorino, R ;
Ferrando, M .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1998, 57 (1-3) :105-125
[8]   Forward with Osmosis: Emerging Applications for Greater Sustainability [J].
Hoover, Laura A. ;
Phillip, William A. ;
Tiraferri, Alberto ;
Yip, Ngai Yin ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (23) :9824-9830
[9]  
Kitagaki T., 2012, J RADIOANAL NUCL CHE, V4, P1
[10]   Ultrafiltration removal of U(VI) from contaminated water [J].
Kryvoruchko, AP ;
Yu, L ;
Atamanenko, ID ;
Kornilovich, BY .
DESALINATION, 2004, 162 (1-3) :229-236