Chemoradiotherapy Before and After Surgery for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

被引:22
作者
Hong, Julian C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Murphy, James D. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang, Samuel J. [5 ]
Koong, Albert C. [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Daniel T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Ctr Canc, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Med & Appl Sci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Radiat Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PHASE-III TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE RADIATION-THERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CURATIVE RESECTION; NEOADJUVANT; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-013-3072-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The optimal combination and timing of therapy for esophageal cancer remains controversial. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare registry was used to assess neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic T3+ or N1+ esophageal adenocarcinoma (ACA) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 1995 to 2002 who underwent surgical resection within 6 months of diagnosis were studied. Medicare data defined preoperative chemoradiotherapy (preCRT), preoperative radiotherapy (preRT), postoperative CRT (postCRT), chemotherapy and surgery (CT + S), and surgery alone. Of 419 eligible patients, 126 received preCRT, 55 preRT, 40 postCRT, 29 CT + S, and 169 surgery alone. PreCRT yielded median overall survival (OS) of 37 months, greater than surgery alone (17 months, p = 0.002) and postCRT (17 months, p = 0.06). PreRT (20 months, p = 0.20), postCRT (p = 0.88), and CT + S (20 months, p = 0.42) were not associated with OS benefit versus surgery alone. For SCC, preCRT improved survival versus surgery alone (p = 0.01), with a trend for ACA (p = 0.07). ACA (22 months) had greater OS than SCC (17 months) (p = 0.03). ACA, younger age, and married status were associated with increased OS. Adjusting for these, preCRT had longer OS versus surgery alone (p = 0.02) and postCRT (p = 0.03). Chemotherapy agents and surgical approach did not affect OS. In the SEER-Medicare cohort, preCRT significantly improved survival versus surgery alone and postCRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer, particularly for SCC. PreRT, postCRT, and CT + S were not associated with longer survival.
引用
收藏
页码:3999 / 4007
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Esophagectomy Compared With Chemoradiation for Early Stage Esophageal Cancer in the Elderly [J].
Abrams, Julian A. ;
Buono, Donna L. ;
Strauss, Joshua ;
McBride, Russell B. ;
Hershman, Dawn L. ;
Neugut, Alfred I. .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (21) :4924-4933
[2]  
Ancona E, 2001, CANCER, V91, P2165, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<2165::AID-CNCR1245>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-H
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, School safety update, P1
[5]  
Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
[6]  
Bédard ELR, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P2423, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2423::AID-CNCR1277>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-T
[8]   Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial [J].
Burmeister, BH ;
Smithers, BM ;
Gebski, V ;
Fitzgerald, L ;
Simes, RJ ;
Devitt, P ;
Ackland, S ;
Gotley, DC ;
Joseph, D ;
Millar, J ;
North, J ;
Walpole, ET ;
Denham, JW .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) :659-668
[9]   Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Based on Histology A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Analysis [J].
Chang, Daniel T. ;
Chapman, Christopher ;
Shen, John ;
Su, Zheng ;
Koong, Albert C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (04) :405-410
[10]   Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer [J].
Cunningham, David ;
Allum, William H. ;
Stenning, Sally P. ;
Thompson, Jeremy N. ;
Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. ;
Nicolson, Marianne ;
Scarffe, J. Howard ;
Lofts, Fiona J. ;
Falk, Stephen J. ;
Iveson, Timothy J. ;
Smith, David B. ;
Langley, Ruth E. ;
Verma, Monica ;
Weeden, Simon ;
Chua, Yu Jo .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (01) :11-20